Showing posts with label cult. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cult. Show all posts

Friday, 28 August 2020

Proof that mormon founder joseph smith was arrested AND CONVICTED for fraud.

 It is not new the fact that joseph smith, the founder of the mormon cult was arrested for "glass looking".

This was taking money from people and pretending to "see" by occult means treasure buried on that persons' land.

But, what mormons WON'T tell you is that joe was not only arrested but CONVICTED of this crime.

They will say he was arrested and not convicted, or they will play the "persecution" or "people had a grudge against him" cards.

Now, these mormons are either ignorant of the incident or are flat out lying to you.

Here i present PROOF by witnesses and OFFICIAL COURT DOCUMENTS which has been discovered that prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that joe was a con-man.




Hiel and Joseph Lewis: "Some time previous to 1825, a man by the name of Wm. Hale, a distant relative of Uncle Isaac Hale, came to Isaac Hale and said that he had been informed by a woman by the name of Odle, who claimed to possess the power of seeing under ground (such persons were then commonly called peepers), that there were great treasures concealed in the hill northeast from Isaac Hale's house, and by her directions Wm. Hale commenced digging. But, being too lazy to work and too poor to hire, he obtained a partner by the name of Oliver Harper, of New York State, who had the means to hire help. But after a short time operations were suspended, for a time, during which Wm. Hale heard of PEEPER Joseph Smith, jr., and wrote to him and soon visited him, and found Smith's representations were so flattering that Smith was either hired or became a partner with Wm. Hale, Oliver Harper and a man by the name of Stowell, who had some property. They hired men and dug in several places.”

"But while he was engaged in looking in his peep-stone and old white hat, directing the digging for money, and boarding at Uncle Isaac Hale's, he formed an intimacy with Mr. Hale's daughter, and after the abandonment of the money-digging speculation, he consummated the elopement and marriage to the said Emma Hale, and she became his accomplice in his humbug Golden Bible and Mormon religion.". Ibid. p. 78, 79. Close relatives of Emma Hale Smith.





Wednesday, 11 January 2017

Mormon Nature Of God vs Christian Nature Of God

The Nature Of God.

"Take up the Bible, compare the religion of the Latter-day Saints with it and see if it will stand the test," (Brigham Young, May 18, 1873, Journal of Discourses, vol. 16, p. 46).

LDS Stance: There are many Gods ( deities ) and you can become one.

References: "It is the first principle of the gospel to know for a certainty the character of God, ...and that He was once a man like us; yea, that God himself, the Father of us all, dwelt on an earth, the same as Jesus Christ Himself did; ...you have got to learn how to be gods yourselves, and to be kings and priests to God, the same as all gods have done before you, namely, by going from one small degree to another,... from exaltation to exaltation, until you attain to the resurrection of the dead, and are able to dwell in everlasting burnings. and to sit in glory, as do those who sit enthroned in everlasting power" (History of the Church, Vol. 6, Ch. 14, p. 305-6).


“I have always declared God to be a distinct personage, Jesus Christ a separate and distinct personage from God the Father, and that the Holy Ghost was a distinct personage and a Spirit: and these three constitute three distinct personages and three Gods.”. joseph smith

 "And they (the Gods) said: Let there be light: and there was light." (Book of Abraham 4:3)

Joseph Smith: "    I will preach on the plurality of Gods. I have selected this text for that express purpose. I wish to declare I have always and in all congregations when I have preached on the subject of the Deity, it has been the plurality of Gods. It has been preached by the Elders for fifteen years."

Joseph Smith: "The head God organized the heavens and the earth. I defy all the world to refute me. In the beginning the heads of the Gods organized the heavens and the earth."

He is our Father-the Father of our spirits, and was once a man in mortal flesh as we are, and is now an exalted Being. How many Gods there are, I do not know. But there never was a time when there were not Gods and worlds, and when men were not passing through the same ordeals that we are now passing through. Brigham Young - Mormon prophet. Journal of Discourses 7:333

   "Our father in heaven, according to the Prophet, had a father, and since there has been a condition of this kind through all eternity, each Father had a Father" (Doctrines of Salvation, 2:47).


Biblical/Christian stance: There is only one God, period.

References: Notice the phrase "for this earth" or "for this world" is never used.

DEUTERONOMY 6:4 "Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God is one Lord:"

DEUTERONOMY 4:35,39 " Unto thee it was shewed, that thou mightest know that the Lord he is God; there is none else beside him.", "Know therefore this day, and consider it in thine heart, that the Lord he is God in heaven above, and upon the earth beneath: there is none else." Note that since Jesus is a God ( in lds treaching ) and is in heaven, that means there are TWO Gods in heaven )

2 SAMUEL 7:22 "Wherefore thou art great, O Lord God: for there is none like thee, neither is there any God beside thee, according to all that we have heard with our ears."

1 KINGS 8:60,  "That all the people of the earth may know that the Lord is God, and that there is none else."

2 KINGS 19:15 "And Hezekiah prayed before the Lord, and said, O Lord God of Israel, which dwellest between the cherubims, thou art the God, even thou alone, of all the kingdoms of the earth; thou hast made heaven and earth."

NEHEMIAH 9:6 " Thou, even thou, art Lord alone; thou hast made heaven, the heaven of heavens, with all their host, the earth, and all things that are therein, the seas, and all that is therein, and thou preservest them all; and the host of heaven worshippeth thee." Note that in Colossians 1:16-20, we read that JESUS created all things. This is one passage that proves the "trinity" doctrine.

ISAIAH 37:16,20 "O Lord of hosts, God of Israel, that dwellest between the cherubims, thou art the God, even thou alone, of all the kingdoms of the earth: thou hast made heaven and earth.", "Now therefore, O Lord our God, save us from his hand, that all the kingdoms of the earth may know that thou art the Lord, even thou only."

ISAIAH 43:10 " Ye are my witnesses, saith the Lord, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me"

ISAIAH 44:6,8 " Thus saith the Lord the King of Israel, and his redeemer the Lord of hosts; I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God.", " Fear ye not, neither be afraid: have not I told thee from that time, and have declared it? ye are even my witnesses. Is there a God beside me? yea, there is no God; I know not any." Note: "beside" does not necessarily mean in a physical sense. "beside me" could be "except for me". Also note that if God is all-knowing and knows everything, IF there were other Gods, wether for this planet or not, HE would know and here He states He does NOT know of any other God.


LDS Stance: God has not always been God, but was once just a man on another planet who had to earn His way to BECOME a God.

References: “We have imagined and supposed that God was God from all eternity. I will refute that idea, and take away the veil, so that you may see. These are incomprehensible ideas to some, but they are simple. It is the first principle of the Gospel to know for a certainty the Character of God, and to know that we may converse with him as one man converses with another, and that he was once a man like us; yea, that God the Father of us all, dwelt on an earth, the same as Jesus Christ himself did, and I will show it from the Bible,” (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, pp. 345-346. )

But if God the Father was not always God, but came to his present exalted position by degrees of progress as indicated in the teachings of the prophet, how has there been a God from all eternity? The answer is that there has been and there now exists an endless line of , stretching back into the eternities. B. H. Roberts - Mormon Seventy and LDS church historian. New Witness for God 1:476

"It is the first principle of the gospel to know for a certainty the character of God, ...and that He was once a man like us; yea, that God himself, the Father of us all, dwelt on an earth, the same as Jesus Christ Himself did; ...you have got to learn how to be gods yourselves, and to be kings and priests to God, the same as all gods have done before you, namely, by going from one small degree to another,... from exaltation to exaltation, until you attain to the resurrection of the dead, and are able to dwell in everlasting burnings. and to sit in glory, as do those who sit enthroned in everlasting power" (History of the Church, Vol. 6, Ch. 14, p. 305-6).

 "God himself was once as we are now, and is an exalted man, and sits enthroned in yonder heavens! That is the great secret. ...I am going to tell you how God came to be God. We have imagined and supposed that God was God from all eternity. I will refute that idea, and take away the veil,..."

  "It appears ridiculous to the world, under their darkened and erroneous traditions, that God has once been a finite being" (Deseret News, Nov. 16, 1859, p. 290).

Biblical/Christian Stance: God the father has always been God the father.

References: Psalm 90:2 "Before the mountains were brought forth, or ever thou hadst formed the earth and the world, even from everlasting to everlasting, thou art God."

Isaiah 57:15 " For thus saith the high and lofty One that inhabiteth eternity, whose name is Holy; I dwell in the high and holy place, with him also that is of a contrite and humble spirit, to revive the spirit of the humble, and to revive the heart of the contrite ones."

Malachi 3:6 " For I am the Lord, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed."

Numbers 23:19 "God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?"

Exodus 3:14 "And God said unto Moses, I Am That I Am: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I Am hath sent me unto you.". note the name "I AM".


Sunday, 1 May 2016

Mormon Fraud - The Kinderhook Plates


The Many Wives Of joseph smith

Masonic Mormon Symbols

Someone asked for proof of the masonic symbols used in mormonism.

"Masons who visit the Temple Block in Salt Lake City are impressed by what they call the Masonic emblems displayed on the outside of the Mormon Temple.

"Yes, the 'Masonic emblems' are displayed on the walls of the Temple—the sun, moon and stars, 'Holiness to the Lord,' the two right hands clasped in fellowship, the All-seeing eye, Alpha and Omega, and the beehive. Masonic writers tell us that the Mormon Temple ritual and their own are slightly similar in some respects.
"Without any apologies we frankly admit that there may be some truth in these statements." (Mormonism and Masonry, Introduction, by E. Cecil McGavin, Bookcraft, 1956)

Sunday, 22 February 2015

Watchtower False Prophecies

Watchtower False Prophecies
Jehovah's Witness leaders for over 100 years have claimed to be God's only living "prophet" on the face of the earth.  However, if one looks at their record, the documented evidence proves they are what Jesus described as "false prophets!" Most Jehovah's Witnesses have no clue about the true history of their organization.  Remember what Jesus said: "And many false prophets will arise, and will mislead many." (Mat. 24:11)

Check out the documented evidence listed by year:

1877 'The End Of This World; that is the end of the gospel and the beginning of the millennial age is nearer than most men suppose; indeed we have already entered the transition period, which is to be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation Dan. 12:3." (N.H. Barbour and C.T. Russell, Three Worlds, and the Harvest of This World, p. 17).
1879 "Christ came in the character of a Bridegroom in 1874.... at the beginning of the Gospel harvest." (Watchtower, Oct 1879, p. 4)
1880 "We need not here repeat the evidences that the "seventh trump" began its sounding A.D., 1840, and will continue until the end of the time of trouble, and the end of "The times of the Gentiles," A.D., 1914, and that it is the trouble of this "Great day," which is here symbolically called the voice of the Archangel when he begins the deliverance of fleshly Israel. "At that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince (Archangel) which standeth for the children of thy people and there shall be a time of trouble such as never was since there was a nation." Dan. xii. 1. Nor will we here, again present the conclusive Bible proof that our Lord came for his Bride in 1874, and has an unseen work as Reaper of the first-fruits of this Gospel Age. (Zion's Watchtower November, 1880 p. 1)
1886 "The outlook at the opening of the New Year has some very encouraging features. The outward evidences are that the marshaling of the hosts for the battle of the great day of God Almighty, is in progress while the skirmishing is commencing. … The time is come for Messiah to take the dominion of earth and to overthrow the oppressors and corrupters of the earth, (Rev. 19:15 and 11:17, 18) preparatory to the establishment of everlasting peace upon the only firm foundation of righteousness and truth." (Zion's Watchtower, January, 1886;Watchtower reprints I, p. 817)
1888 "In this chapter we present the Bible evidence proving that the full end of the times of the gentiles, i.e., the full end of their lease of dominion, will be reached in A.D. 1914; and that the date will be the farthest limit of the rule of imperfect men. And be it observed, that if this is shown to be a fact firmly established by the Scriptures, it will prove; Firstly, that at that date the Kingdom of God, for which our Lord taught us to pray, saying, Thy Kingdom come, will obtain full, universal control, and that it will then be set up, or firmly established, in the earth, on the ruins of present institutions." (The Time Is At Hand, 1888, p. 76, 77)
1889 "Be not surprised, then, when in subsequent chapters we present proofs that the setting up of the Kingdom of God is already begun, that it is pointed out in prophecy as due to begin the exercise of power in A.D. 1878, and that the 'battle of the great day of God Almighty (Rev. 16:14) which will end in A.D. 1914 with the complete overthrow of earth's present rulership, is already commenced. The gathering of the armies is plainly visible from the standpoint of God's word." (Studies in the Scriptures, Vol. 2, The Time Is At Hand, 1889 Ed., p. 101. The 1915 Edition of this texts changed "A.D. 1914" to read 'A.D. 1915')
1889 "Here we furnish the evidence that from the creation of Adam to (but not including) A.D. 1873 was six thousand years. And though the Bible contains no direct statement that the seventh thousand will be the epoch of Christ's reign, the great Sabbath Day of restitution to the world, yet the venerable tradition is not without a reasonable foundation." (Studies in the Scriptures, Vol. 2, p. 39. 1889)
1889 "If, then, the seventh thousand-year period of earth's history be an epoch specially noted as the period of Christ's reign, we shall by showing that it began in 1873, be proving that we are already in it." (Studies in the Scriptures, Vol. 2, p. 40. 1889)
1889 "In the coming 26 years, all present governments will be overthrown and dissolved." (C.T. Russell, Studies in the Scriptures, Vol. 2, p. 98-99, 1889)
1889 "In this chapter we present the Bible evidence which indicates that six thousand years from the creation of Adam were complete with A.D. 1872; and hence that, since A.D. 1872 are chronologically entered upon the seventh thousand or the Millennium." (Studies in the Scriptures, Vol. 2, p. 33, 1889)
1889 "Remember that the forty years' Jewish Harvest ended October A.D. 69, and was followed by the complete overthrow of that nation; and that likewise the forty years of the Gospel age harvest will end October, 1914, and that likewise the overthrow of 'Christendom,' so-called, must be expected to immediately follow." (Studies in the Scriptures, Vol. 2, p. 245)
1894 "Seventeen years ago people said, concerning the time features presented in Millennial Dawn, They seem reasonable in many respects, but surely no such radical changes could occur between now and the close of 1914: if you had proved that they would come about in a century or two, it would seem much more probable. What changes have since occurred, and what velocity is gained daily? 'The old is quickly passing and the new is coming in.' Now, in view of recent labor troubles and threatened anarchy, our readers are writing to know if there may not be a mistake in the 1914 date. They say that they do not see how present conditions can hold out so long under the strain. We see no reason for changing the figures-nor could we change them if we would. They are, we believe, God's dates, not ours. But bear in mind that the end of 1914 is not the date for the beginning, but for the end of the time of trouble." (Zion's Watchtower, Can It Be Delayed until 1914? C. T. Russell July 15, 1894, Also in Watchtower Reprints, l894 p. 1677)
1894 "A few more years will wind up the present order of things, and then the chastened world will stand face to face with the actual conditions of the established Kingdom of God. And yet the course of the Church is to be finished within the space of time that intervenes." (Watchtower p. 56, 1894)
1894 "We see no reason for changing the figures - nor could we change them if we would. They are, we believe, God's dates, not ours. But bear in mind that the end of 1914 is not the date for the beginning, but for the end of the time of trouble." (Watchtower July 15, 1894, p 266; p 1677 reprints)
1894 "We see no reason for changing the figures nor could we change them if we would. They are, we believe, Gods dates, not ours. But bear in mind that the end of 1914 is not the date for the beginning, but for the end of the time of trouble." (Watchtower, July 15, 1894, Reprints p. 1677)
1897 "...this measurement is 3416 inches, symbolizing 3416 years.... This calculation shows A.D. 1874 as marking the beginning of the period of trouble...." (Russell, Studies in the Scriptures: Thy Kingdom Come, Series III, p. 342, 1897 edition)Note: The 1916 edition changed to read: "We find it to be 3457 inches, symbolizing 3457 years.... Thus the Pyramid witnesses that the close of 1914 will be the beginning of the time of trouble...."  (The measurement was the length of an interior passageway discovered inside the Pyramids. It has no reference in Scripture.)
1897 "Complete destruction of the 'powers that be' of 'this present evil worlds - political, financial, ecclesiastical - about the close of the Time of the Gentiles; October A.D. 1914." (C.T. Russell, Studies in the Scriptures, IV, p. 622, 1897)
1897 "Our Lord, the appointed King, is now present, since October 1874, A.D....and the formal inauguration of his kingly office dates from April 1878, A.D." (Studies in the Scriptures, Vol.4, p.621, 1897)
1897 "The distillery, the brewery, the saloon, the brothel, the pool-room, all time-killing and character-depraving business will be stopped; and their servants will be given something to do that will be beneficial to themselves and others. "Similarly, the building of war-vessels, the manufacture of munitions of war and defense will cease, and armies will be disbanded. The new Kingdom will have no need of these, but will have abundant power to execute summary justice in the punishment of evil doers... "The banking and brokerage business, and other like employment's, very useful under present conditions, will no longer have a place; for under the new conditions the human race will be required to treat each others as members of one family, and private capital and money to loan and to be needed will be things of the past. Landlords and renting agencies will find new employment also, because the new King will not recognize as valid patents and deeds now on record. "...namely, that with present conveniences, if the whole people were put to work systematically and wisely, not more than three hours labor for each individual would be necessary." (Studies, Vol. IV, pp. 633-635, 1897)
1902 "In view of this strong Bible evidence concerning the Times of the Gentiles, we consider it an established truth that the final end of the kingdoms of this world, and the full establishment of the kingdom of God, will be accomplished by the end of A.D. 1914." (The Time Is At Hand, 1902 edition, p. 99)
1903 "When Uranus and Jupiter meet in the humane sign of Aquarius in 1914, the long-promised era will have made a fair start in the work of setting man free to work out his own salvation, and will insure the ultimate realization of dreams and ideals of all poets and sages in history." (Watchtower, May 1, 1903, p. 130-131; p3184 Reprints)
1904 "According to our expectations the stress of the great time of trouble will be on us soon, somewhere between 1910 and 1912, culminating with the end of the 'Times of the Gentiles,' October, 1914." (The New Creation, Studies in the Scriptures, Vol. 6, p. 579, 1904)
1908 "In view of this strong Bible evidence concerning the Times of the Gentiles, we consider it an established truth that the final end of the kingdoms of this world, and the full establishment of the Kingdom of God, will be accomplished at the end of A. D. 1914." (The Time Is At Hand; 1889; 1908 ed.; p. 99)
1908 "True, it is expecting great things to claim, as we do, that within the coming twenty-six years all present governments will be overthrown and dissolved" (The Time Is At Hand; 1889; 1908 ed.; p. 99)
1914 "Even if the time of our change should not come within ten years, what more should we ask? Are we not a blessed, happy people? Is not our God faithful? If anyone knows anything better, let him take it. If any of you ever find anything better, we hope you will tell us." (Watchtower, Dec 15, 1914, p. 376.)
1914 "Studying God's Word, we have measured the 2520 years, the seven symbolic times, from that year 606 B.C. and have found that it reached down to October 1914, as nearly as we were able to reckon. We did not say positively that this would be the year." (Watchtower, November 1, 1914, p. 325)
1914 "While it's possible that Armageddon may begin next Spring, yet this purely speculation to attempt to say just when. We see, however, that there are parallels between the close of the Jewish age and this Gospel age. These parallels seem to point to the year just before us part particularly the early months." (Watchtower Reprints, VI, Sept 1, 1914, p. 5527)
1914 "There is absolutely no ground for Bible students to question that the consummation of this Gospel age is now even at the door, and that it will end as the Scriptures foretell in a great time of trouble such as never was since there was a nation. We see the participants in this great crisis banding themselves together… The great crisis, the great clash, symbolically represented as a fire, that will consume the ecclesiastical heavens and the social earth, is very near." (Watchtower Reprints, VI, May 1, 1914, p. 5450)
1915 "The present great war in Europe is the beginning of the Armageddon of the Scriptures (Rev. 19:16-20). It will eventuate in the complete overthrow of all the systems of error which have so long oppressed the people of God and deluded the world. We believe the present war cannot last much longer until revolutions shall break out" (C.T. Russell, Pastor Russell's Sermons, p. 676, Sometime during World War I)
1915 Here we furnish the evidence that from the creation of Adam to A.D. 1873 was six thousand years. And though the Bible contains no direct statement that the seventh thousand will be the epoch of Christ's reign, the great Sabbath Day of restitution to the world, yet the venerable tradition is not without reasonable foundation. (The Time Is At Hand; 1889; 1915 ed.; p. 39)
1915 If, then, the seventh thousand-year period of earth's history be an epoch specially noted as the period of Christ's reign, we shall, by showing that it began in A.D. 1873, be proving that we are already in it. (The Time Is At Hand; 1889; 1915 ed.; p. 40)
1915 Firstly, that at that date [1914] the Kingdom of God, for which our Lord taught us to pray, saying, "Thy Kingdom come," will begin to assume control, and that it will then shortly be "set up," or firmly established, in the earth, on the ruins of present institutions. (The Time Is At Hand; 1889; 1915 ed.; p. 77)
1915 "In view of this strong Bible evidence concerning the Times of the Gentiles, we consider it an established truth that the final end of the kingdoms of this world, and the full establishment of the kingdom of God, will be accomplished near the end of A.D. 1915. (The Time Is At Hand, 1915 edition, p. 99)
1915 "Be not surprised, then, when in subsequent chapters we present proofs that the setting up of the Kingdom of God is already begun, that it is pointed out in prophecy as due to begin the exercise of power in A.D. 1878, and that the 'battle of the great day of God Almighty' (Rev. 16:14), which will end in A.D. 1915, with the complete overthrow of the earth's present rulership, is already commenced." (The Time Is At Hand; 1889; 1915 ed.; p. 101)
1915 "As in the type that date - three and a half years after the death of Christ - marked the end of all special favor to the Jew and the beginning of favor to the Gentiles, so we recognize A.D. 1881 as marking the close of the 'high calling,' or invitation to the blessing peculiar to this age - to become joint-heirs with Christ and partakers of the divine nature." (The Time Is At Hand; 1889; 1915 ed.; p. 235)
1915 So it was in this harvest also up to A.D. 1878 the time prophecies and the fact of the Lord's presence, substantially as here presented, though less clearly, was our message. Since then the work has widened, and the view of other truths has become brighter and clearer; but the same fact and scriptures, teaching the same time and presence, stand unchallenged and incontrovertible. (The Time Is At Hand; 1889; 1915 ed.; p. 236)
1915 The Gentile Times prove that the present governments must all be overturned about the close of A.D. 1915; and Parallelism above shows that this period corresponds exactly with the year A.D. 70, which witnessed the completion of the downfall of the Jewish polity. (The Time Is At Hand, 1915 edition, p. 242)
1915 We are already living in the seventh millennium - since October 1872. (The Time Is At Hand; 1889; 1915 ed.; p. 363)
1915 The Battle of Armageddon, to which this war is leading, will be a great contest between right and wrong, and will signify the complete and everlasting overthrow of the wrong, and the permanent establishment of Messiah's righteous kingdom for the blessing of the world. … Our sympathies are broad enough to cover all engaged in the dreadful strife, as our hope is broad enough and deep enough to include all in the great blessings which our Master and his Millennial kingdom are about to bring to the world. (Watchtower Reprints, VI, April 1, 1915, p. 5659)
1915 To our understanding the general call to this joint heirship with our Redeemer as members of the New Creation of God, ceased in 1881. (The New Creation; 1899; 1915 ed.; p. 95)
1916 "The Bible chronology herein presented shows that the six great 1000 year days beginning with Adam are ended, and that the great 7th Day, the 1000 years of Christ's Reign, began in 1873." (The Time Is At Hand, Foreword, p 2, 1916)
1916 We see no reason for doubting, therefore, that the Times of the Gentiles ended in October, 1914; and that a few more years will witness their utter collapse and the full establishment of God's kingdom in the hands of Messiah." (Watchtower Reprints, VI, Sept 1, 1916, p. 5950)
1917 'There will be no slip-up...Abraham should enter upon the actual possession of his promised inheritance in the year 1925' (Watchtower Oct. 15, 1917, p. 6157)
1917 The Spring of 1918 will bring upon Christendom a spasm of anguish greater even than that experienced in the Fall of 1914.... The travail that is coming is to be upon nominal Zion- "Christendom" … "Babylon"; and it will be a great and sore affliction - "A Time of Trouble such as was not since there was a nation." (The Finished Mystery p. 62 [stated to be the "Posthumous Work of Pastor Russell" on p. 2])
1917 'No doubt Satan believed the Millennial Kingdom was due to be set-up in 1915...Be that as it may, there is evidence that the establishment of the Kingdom in Palestine will probably be in 1925, ten years later than we once calculated.' (Studies In The Scriptures, Vol 7, The Finished Mystery, p. 128)
1917 Some interesting developments in connection with the setting up of the Kingdom may occur in 1920, six years after the great Time of Trouble began. It would not be strange if this were so, when we recall that after forty years wandering in the wilderness the Israelites came into possession of the land of Canaan after a further six years. As these matters are still future we can but wait to see. We anticipate that the "earthquake" will occur early in 1918, and that the "fire" will come in the fall of 1920. [The Finished Mystery, 1917, p. 178, Comments on Revelation 11:13. [The 1926 ed. reads: "and that the 'fire' will follow in due course."])
1917 "And the mountains were not found. Even the republics will disappear in the fall of 1920. And the mountains were not found. Every kingdom of earth will pass away, be swallowed up in anarchy." (The Finished Mystery, 1917 edition, p. 258)
1917 Pastor Russell's mission, in large part, was to advise Christendom of its impending end, in the time of world-wide trouble. It is the Divine judgment upon the nations. … There will be no chance of escaping from destruction, through the nations. … The trouble is due to the dawning of the Day of Christ, the Millennium. It is the Day of Vengeance, which began in the world war of 1914 and which will break like a furious morning storm in 1918." (The Finished Mystery, 1917, p. 404)
1917 "Until 1878 the nominal church had been in a sense God's sanctuary or temple; but He was from then on, culminating in 1918, to remove it with a stroke or plague of erroneous doctrines and deeds Divinely permitted. The Church was the strength of Christendom, that about which its life centered, and around which its institutions were built. It was the desire of the eyes of the people, that which all Christians loved. Nevertheless, God was to make manifest the profanation which ecclesiasticism had made of the Christian Church, and to cause the church organizations to become to Him as one dead, an unclean thing, not to be touched, or mourned. And the 'children of the church' shall perish by the sword of war, revolution and anarchy, and by the Sword of the Spirit be made to see that they have lost their hope of life on the spirit plane -- that 'the door is shut."' (Studies in the Scriptures, vol. 7, 1917 p. 484.)
1917 Also, in the year 1918, when God destroys the churches wholesale and the church members by million, it shall be that any that escape shall come to the works of Pastor Russell to learn the meaning of the downfall of Christianity. (The Finished Mystery, 1917 edition, p. 485)
Continued on next page...

Saturday, 27 September 2014

Joseph Smith and the Kinderhook Plates



In 1843 six brass plates were found in a mound in Kinderhook, Illinois. Mormons who saw the plates were impressed by their ancient appearance and felt that they would prove Joseph Smith's Book of Mormon. In a letter written from Nauvoo, Illinois, dated May 2, 1843, Charlotte Haven said that when Joshua Moore "showed them to Joseph [Smith] the letter said that the figures or writing on them was similar to that in which the Book of Mormon was written, and if Mr. Moore could leave them, he thought that by the help of revelation he would be able to translate them" (Overland Monthly, Dec. 1890, page 630).
While the Kinderhook plates have often been put forth as evidence for Joseph Smith's claims concerning the Book of Mormon, there is another side to the story. Evidence now shows that the Kinderhook plates were actually modern forgeries created specifically for the purpose of entrapping Joseph Smith.

Joseph Smith accepted these plates as authentic and even claimed that he had translated a portion of them. The evidence comes from the diary of William Clayton, Joseph Smith's private secretary. The information in Clayton's journal was deemed so important that it was put in the first person and used as a basis for the story of the Kinderhook plates which is printed in the History of the Church, vol. 5, page 372. The following is attributed to Joseph Smith:

I insert fac-similes of the six brass plates found near Kinderhook, . . .
I have translated a portion of them and find they contain the history of the person with whom they were found. He was a descendant of Ham, through the loins of Pharaoh, king of Egypt, and that he received his kingdom from the Ruler of heaven and earth.

After the plates were found, nine "citizens of Kinderhook" certified that R. Wiley took the "six brass-plates" from "a large mound, in this vicinity." Unfortunately for the LDS position, it was later revealed that the plates were forgeries. On April 25, 1856, W. P. Harris, who was one of the nine witnesses to the discovery of the plates, wrote a letter in which he stated that the plates were not genuine:

. . . I was present with a number at or near Kinderhook and helped to dig at the time the plates were found . . . I . . . made an honest affidavit to the same. . . . since that time, Bridge Whitten said to me that he cut and prepared the plates and he . . . and R. Wiley engraved them themselves. . . . Wilbourn Fugit appeared to be the chief, with R. Wiley and B. Whitten. (The Book of Mormon?, by James D. Bales, pp. 95-96)

On June 30, 1879, W. Fugate, who was also one of the nine people who signed the certificate, wrote a letter in which he admitted his part in the hoax:

I received your letter in regard to those plates, and will say in answer that they are a humbug, gotten up by Robert Wiley, Bridge Whitten and myself. . . . We read in Pratt's prophecy that "Truth is yet to spring out of the earth." We concluded to prove the prophecy by way of a joke. (Letter of W. Fugate, as cited in The Kinderhook Plates by Welby W. Ricks, reprinted from the Improvement Era, September 1962)

At the time of the Civil War the Kinderhook plates were lost. M. Wilford Poulson, of Brigham Young University, later found one of the original plates in the Chicago Historical Society Museum. The plate which he found has been identified as no. 5 in the facsimiles printed in the History of the Church. While Professor Poulson's research led him to believe that the plate was a forgery, Welby W. Ricks, who was President of the BYU Archaeological Society, hailed the discovery as a vindication of Joseph Smith's work:

A recent rediscovery of one of the Kinderhook plates which was examined by Joseph Smith, Jun., reaffirms his prophetic calling and reveals the false statements made by one of the finders. . . .

The plates are now back in their original categoryof genuine. . . . Joseph Smith, Jun., stands as a true prophet and translator of ancient records by divine means and all the world is invited to investigate the truth which has sprung out of the earth not only of the Kinderhook plates, but of the Book of Mormon as well. (The Kinderhook Plates)

In 1965, three years after Mr. Ricks made this triumphant announcement, George M. Lawrence, an LDS physicist was given permission to examine and make "some non-destructive physical studies of the surviving plate." In his "Report of a Physical Study of the Kinderhook Plate Number 5," George Lawrence wrote:
The dimensions, tolerances, composition and workmanship are consistent with the facilities of an 1843 blacksmith shop and with the fraud stories of the original participants.

Since Mr. Lawrence was only allowed to make non-destructive tests, some LDS scholars would not accept his work as conclusive. In 1980, however, LDS scholar Stanley P. Kimball was able "to secure permission from the Chicago Historical Society for the recommended destructive tests." Professor Kimball described the results of the tests in the official LDS Church publication, The Ensign, August 1981, pages 66-70:

A recent electronic and chemical analysis of a metal plate. . . brought in 1843 to the prophet Joseph Smith. . . appears to solve a previously unanswered question in Church history, helping to further evidence that the plate is what its producers later said it was—a nineteenth-century attempt to lure Joseph Smith into making a translation of ancient-looking characters that had been etched into the plates. . . . As a result of these tests, we concluded that the plate . . . is not of ancient origin. . . . we concluded that the plate was made from a true brass alloy (copper and zinc) typical of the mid-nineteenth century; whereas the "brass" of ancient times was actually bronze, an alloy of copper and tin.

If Joseph Smith had not been murdered in June 1844, it is very possible he might have published a complete "translation" of these bogus plates. Just a month before his death it was reported that he was "busy intranslating them. The new work . . . will be nothing more nor less than a sequel to the Book of Mormon. . . " (Warsaw Signal, May 22, 1844). The fact that Joseph Smith was actually preparing to print a translation of the plates is verified by a broadside published by the LDS newspaper, The Nauvoo Neighbor, in June 1843. On this broadside, containing facsimiles of the plates, we find the following:

The contents of the Plates, together with a Fac-Simile of the same, will be published in the "Times and Seasons," as soon as the translation is completed.

In any case, it is obvious that Joseph Smith's work on these fraudulent plates casts serious doubt upon his credibility as a translator of LDS scriptures like the Book of Mormon and the Book of Abraham. Smith's work on the Kinderhook plates was supposed to have revealed that they "contain the history of the person with whom they were found. He was a descendant of Ham, through the loins of Pharaoh, king of Egypt and that he received his kingdom from the Ruler of heaven and earth." Now, in order to derive this much information from the plates it would have been necessary to have "translated" quite a number of the words. A man who could invent such information from bogus plates is just the type of man who would pretend to translate the Book of Abraham from Egyptian papyri which he really knew nothing about or the Book of Mormon from golden plates which he never made available to scholars. Charles A. Shook once observed: "Only a bogus prophet translates bogus plates." While this may not be the most tactful way of putting it, this is a very serious problem which cannot be brushed aside. Furthermore, Jesus himself has told us to "Beware of false prophets" (Matthew 7:15).

While the forged Kinderhook plates present a real dilemma for those who maintain Joseph Smith was a prophet of God, Smith's purported translation of the Book of Abraham presents an even greater problem. For more information on these subjects see the book,Major Problems of Mormonism.

Changes to the Doctrine & Covenants

Changes to the Doctrine & Covenants

The Mormon scripture called the Doctrine and Covenants is a series of revelations which Joseph Smith and other LDS prophets claimed to receive directly from God. The first of these revelations were printed in The Book of Commandments in the year 1833. Since that time many of these revelations have been radically altered, with words and even whole sentences deleted. In other places later doctrinal innovations were written back into earlier revelations to hide the glaring contradictions that would otherwise result. In this way, events that were previously unheard of suddenly become part of the historical record as a revelation from God.

Here are some specific examples representative of thousands of changes:
 
Original 1833 Book of CommandmentsCurrent, Altered Doctrine & Covenants
BC 4:2, p. 10 — and he has a gift to translate the book [of Mormon], and I have commanded him that he shall pretend to no other gift, for I will grant him no other gift.
[Harmony, Pennsylvania March 1829]
D&C 5:4 — And you have a gift to translate the plates;[and this is the first gift that I bestowed upon you;] and I have commanded that you should pretend to no other gift [until my purpose is fulfilled in this;] for I will grant unto you no other gift [until it is finished].
Note: The changes to this revelation were necessary for Joseph had already claimed the divine ability to do his own translation of the Bible. Later he would claim the gift to translate ancient Egyptian papyri. However, the evidence does not support these as authentic translations.2
BC 28:6-7, p. 60 — Behold this is wisdom in me, wherefore marvel not, for the hour cometh that I will drink of the fruit of the vine with you, on the earth, and with all those whom my Father hath given me out of the world:
Wherefore lift up your hearts and rejoice, and gird up your loins and be faithful until I come: even so. Amen.
[Harmony, Pennsylvania September 4, 1830]
D&C 27:5ff — Behold this is wisdom in me, wherefore marvel not, for the hour cometh that I will drink of the fruit of the vine with you, on the earth, and with[Moroni, whom I have sent unto you to reveal the Book of Mormon, containing the fulness of the everlasting gospel…]
[Harmony, Pennsylvania first part August 1830, remainder September 1830]
Note: At this point in the revelation over 300 words are added regarding the restoration of the Mormon priesthood by means of divine ordination. By making the account part of a revelation that is dated to 1830, it appears the story has been known since then. However, it is not a part of any revelation until the 1835 edition of the Doctrine & Covenants (section L(50) v. 2, p. 180). Apparently Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery, who were in charge of editing the 1835 D&C, inserted this material so that the concept of the Aaronic and Melchizedek priesthoods being restored and the office of high priest would appear to have been in place from the start and would appear to have been given directly by God. The revelation concludes with over 130 additional words, taken from the Bible copied almost verbatim from Ephesians 6:13-17. No explanation is given for the dating discrepancy.
BC 44:26, p. 92 — If thou lovest me thou shalt serve me and keep all my commandments; and behold, thou shalt consecrate all thy properties, that which thou hast unto me, with a covenant and a deed which can not be broken; and they shall be laid before the bishop of my church, and two of the elders, such as he shall appoint and set apart for that purpose.
[Kirtland, Ohio February 1831]
D&C 42:29-30 — If thou lovest me thou shalt serve me and keep all my commandments; and behold,[thou wilt remember the poor, and] thou shaltconsecrate [of] all thy properties [for their support] that which thou hast [to impart] unto me [them] with a covenant and a deed which can not be broken. [And inasmuch as ye impart of your substance unto the poor, ye will do it unto me] and they shall be laid before the bishop of my church [and his counselors], two of the elders [or high priests], such as he shall appoint [or has appointed] and set apart for that purpose. (February 1831)
Note: By 1835 when the D&C was printed Joseph Smith had given up on the idea of communalism. Therefore this revelation was changed so that Mormons were no longer told by God to consecrate all their properties, but instead the emphasis is shifted to a command to remember the poor and give "of your property". Also, at the time the revelation was originally given there was no office of "counselor" or "high priest" in the Mormon church, so these also had to be added to the revelation retroactively, once again giving the appearance these offices were there from the beginning.
BC 9:1, p. 22 — Now, behold I say unto you, that because you delivered up so many writings, which you had power to translate, into the hands of a wicked man, you have lost them, and you also lost your gift at the same time …
[Harmony, Pennsylvania May 1829]

[View Book of Commandments text.]
D&C 10:1 9:1 — Now, behold I say unto you, that because you delivered up so many [those] writings, which you had power [given unto you] to translate [by the means of the Urim and Thummim], into the hands of a wicked man, you have lost them.
(v.2) And you also lost your gift at the same time, [and your mind became darkened].

Note: There is no mention of the Old Testament Urim and Thummim in the Book of Mormon nor is there any connection of the Urim and Thummim to the translation of the Book of Mormon until 1833, which is four years after this revelation was supposedly given.
Another example of a revelation that has undergone hundreds of changes was first published in The Evening & Morning Star in October 1832. The revelation was said to have been received in November of 1831. This revelation is now D&C 68 and contains multiple references to the Melchizedek priesthood, high priests and the First Presidency. Once again the attempt is made to write later developments into previously given revelations to make them fit Joseph’s evolving church structure.

Tuesday, 23 September 2014

22 Shocking FACTS the Mormon Church Does NOT Want YOU to Know!

1. Joseph Smith Denied He Was A Polygamist!

Joseph Smith publicly denied all his life that he was ever a polygamist. Yet, he had 33 wives, including his own foster daughters, the Lawrence sisters, aged 14 and 16. Joseph Smith was also "married" to women who were already married and living with other men at the time, men who apparently did not know their wives were married to Joseph Smith. In May of 1844 he declared:
"What a thing it is for a man to be accused of committing adultery, and having seven wives, when I can only find one." (History of the Church 6:411)
At that time, Joseph Smith had at least thirty "wives". He only provided for three of them (his public wife Emma and his two foster-daughters who lived with him). The other women were either very young girls still living at home, or they were the wives of other men living with those men.

Here are more denials, from the pens of Joseph Smith, while he was "married" to many different women:



History of the Church, vol. 2, pg. 247 (August 1835)
"The clerk of every church should keep a record of all marriages solemnized in his branch. All legal contracts of marriage made before a person is baptized into this Church should be held sacred and fulfilled. Inasmuch as this Church of Christ has been reproached with the crime of fornication and polygamy, we declare that we believe that one man should have one wife, and one woman but one husband, except in the case of death, when either is at liberty to marry again."

Messenger and Advocate (Aug 1835) pg. 163
"All legal contracts of marriage made before a person is baptized into this church should be held sacred and fulflled. Inasmuch as this Church of Christ has been reproached with the crime of fornication, and polygamy: we declare that we believe, that one man should have one wife: one woman, but one husband, except in teh case of death, when either is at liberty to marry again."

History of the Church, vol. 5, pg. 30 (May 1836)
"Inasmuch as this Church of Christ has been reproached with the crime of fornication and polygamy, we declare that we believe that one man, should have one wife, and one woman but one husband, except in case of death,, when either is at liberty to marry again."

Messenger and Advocate (May 1837), pg. 511:
"1st. That we will have no fellowship whatever with any Elder belonging to the quorums of the Seventies who is guilty of polygamy or any offense of the kind, and who does not in all things conform to the laws of the church contained in the Bible and in the Book of Doctrine and Covenants."

Times and Seasons, vol. 4, pg. 939 (October 1, 1842)
"All legal contracts of marriage made before a person is baptized into this church, should be held sacred and fulfilled. Inasmuch as this church of Christ has been reproached with the crime of fornication, and polygamy: we declare that we believe, that one man should have one wife; and one woman, but one husband, except in the case of death, when either is at liberty to marry again. It is not right to persuade a woman to be baptized contrary to the will of her husband neither is it lawful to influence her to leave her husband."

Times and Seasons, vol. 4, pg. 28 (December 1, 1842)
"He spoke of the various publications of Bennett and others, and of the prejudices which they had necessarily excited-that the Mormons were charged with sanctioning a community of wives and of goods, with polygamy, and various other enormities, not one word of which is true."


History of the Church, vol. 6, pg. 405 (May 25, 1844)
"Saturday, 25 -- At home, keeping out of the way of expected writs from Carthage. Towards evening, Edward Hunter and William Marks, of the grand jury returned from Carthage; also Marshal John P. Greene and Almon W. Babbitt, who informed me there were two indictments found against me, one chargine me false swearing on the testimony of Joseph H. Jackson and Robert D. Foster, and one charging me of polygamy, or something else, on the testimony of William Law, that I told him so! The particulars of which I shall learn hearafter. There was much false swearing before the grand jury."

History of the Church, vol. 6, pg. 411 (May 1844)
"It is not right for a man to bare down his neck to the oppressor always. Be humble and patient in all circumstances of life; we shall then triumph more gloriously. What a thing it is for a man to be accused of committing adultery, and having seven wives, when I can only find one."

Times and Seasons, vol. 5, pg. 423 (February 1, 1844) "As we have lately been credibly informed, that an Elder of the Church of Jesus Christ, of Latter day Saints, by the name of Hiram Brown, has been preaching Polygamy, and other false and corrupt doctrines, in the county of Lapeer, state of Michigan."


The men who accused Joseph Smith of being a polygamist, and have many wives, during the time he publicly denied he was a polygamist, and stating repeatedly he was against polygamy and had only one wife, were:


*John C. Bennett. Former "Associate President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints". Former Mayor of Nauvoo. Close friend and associate of Joseph Smith. Bennett seduced a number of women and some young men in Nauvoo, and was eventually disfellowshipped.


*William Law. The Second Counsellor in the First Presidency of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. Law claimed Joseph stole money, was a liar, thief,a possible murderer, and polygamist. Joseph called Law a "liar" and insisted he (Joseph) was not a polygamist.

*Sidney Rigdon. Former First Counsellor in the First Presidency. Accused Joseph Smith of trying to seduce his daughter Nancy. In letters and comments to others accused Joseph Smith of being a polygamist and a "fallen prophet".


*Brigham Young. Chief Apostle and successor to Joseph Smith. Denied in 1845 that the Mormons practiced polygamy. However, in 1852, in Utah, admitted to the world that the Mormons DID practice polygamy in Nauvoo, and that Joseph Smith was a polygamist with many wives in Nauvoo.


The diaries and statements of over 70 people, all Mormons, have been gathered, all of which state that they were the wives of Joseph Smith, or that Joseph Smith asked them to give him their daughter as a wife, or that they were told by Joseph Smith, personally, that polygamy was of God; all during the time Joseph Smith pubicly declared polygamy to be a "false doctrine" and excommunicated anyone who taught polygamy openly.


Joseph Smith married five pairs of sisters: Delcena and Almera Johnson, Eliza and Emily Partridge, Sarah and Maria Lawrence, Mary Ann and Olive Grey Frost, and Prescinda and Zina Huntington. Patty and Sylvia Sessions were mother and daughter.

This is what the Old Testament says about a man marrying a mother and her daughter:
"And if a man take a wife and her mother, it is wickedness, they shall be burnt with fire both he and they; that there be no wickeness among you." (Leviticus 20:14)
All of these women are listed as "the wives of Joseph Smith" on the website Ancestry.com under the genealogy of Joseph Smith. Ancestry.com is sponsored by the Mormon Church.





2. The REAL Reason Joseph Smith was killed in 1844

Mormons are told from birth that Joseph Smith was a martyr, that he voluntarily went to Carthage Jail in June of 1844 to surrender his life for the truth "as a lamb to the slaughter"; knowing he would die for the truth. They are not told the "reason" he was arrested. Most Church teachers simply tell young Mormons that Joseph Smith was arrested on "trumped up charges"; not telling them what the charges are. Mormons youth believe this, without question, that Joseph Smith was arrested and killed merely because he was the head of an unpopular religion. The truth is this:


In 1844 a Mormon named Lawrence dies. He has two orphaned daughters, Sarah and Maria, ages 14 and 16. Before his death, Lawrence names the two leaders of the Church at that time, Joseph Smith, and his first counsellor in the First Presidency, William Law, to be the Guardians (i.e. Foster-Fathers) of the two girls. Who better men to trust than the two closest men to God on earth? Lawrence leaves his daughters about $1800 in cash and holdings, a huge sum at that time.

William Law. The second most powerful man in the Mormon Church in 1844.

William Law, the first counsellor in the First Presidency of the Mormon Church, then claims the following. He claims that Joseph Smith "married" both the daughters to himself (Joseph), who were living the Smith home at the time. That's right! Joseph Smith married his own foster-daughters! Law also claims that Joseph Smith appropriated their inheritance money for himself. William Law then discovers that Joseph Smith has many more secret "wives". He concludes that Joseph has "fallen". He privately confronts Joseph Smith, who tells him polygamy is of God and that Law just had to accept that. This is at the same time Joseph Smith is publicly denying he is a polygamist, and also excommunicating anyone who publicly teaches polygamy.

William Law then forms a cabal with some other apostate Mormons to depose Joseph Smith and take over the Church (Law is First Counsellor, the second highest Mormon Church office). Members of this cabal include some of the highest men in the Church at that time. Most of the Apostles were away on missions to England. The cabal plan to either get Joseph Smith arrested and sent away, or publicly disgraced so that Joseph Smith would resign as Prophet. There is no evidence they plan to kill him, or that any of them had anything to do with his assassination. They plan to appoint David Whitmer as the new Prophet of the Church.

David Whitmer was one of the "Three Witnesses" to The Book of Mormon. It was on a Whitmer farm that the Book of Mormon was translated. It was at another Whitmer farm that the Church was founded in 1830. Whitmer left the Church in 1838, claiming that Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery had a "band of Danites" who were stealing from Gentiles (non-mormons) and that Cowdery had threatened his life for revealing that fact. Whitmer left and settled in Richmond, Missouri. He tried to start another "Church of Christ" but his efforts proved fruitless. The cabal in Nauvoo decided to wrest the Church away from Joseph Smith, and have Whitmer appointed the new Prophet. The group decide to publish a newspaper called "The Nauvoo Expositor" which will, in a few issues, expose Joseph Smith as a secret polygamist, thief, liar, tyrant, and "fallen" prophet (not false, but "fallen"). They buy a printing press, and issue the first edition of The Nauvoo Expositor.

Joseph Smith, as mayor of Nauvoo, imediately orders the Nauvoo Expositor to be closed, and orders the Town Marshall to take the plates for the publication into the street and destroy them. The Marshall obeys, and the type and printing press is carried out into the street and destroyed with large hammers. William Law and the other members of the cabal (all of them Mormons in high Church positions) say they they received many death threats, and had to leave Nauvoo for their own safety.

The governor of Illinois then issues an arrest warrant for Joseph Smith, because he has illegally shut down an opposition newspaper. Joseph Smith does not go quietly. He first calls up the 3,000 strong Nauvoo Legion, and asks them to prevent his arrest at all costs. The Governor issues a new arrest warrent for treason against the State, because only HE (the Governor) can call up a State Militia for action, and the Nauvoo Legion is part of the State Militia of Illinois. He issues a direct order for the Nauvoo Legion to stand-down. Joseph Smith then flees to the Territory of Iowa, but a number of close friends of his accuse of him of being a coward. Joseph Smith reluctantly returns to Nauvoo and surrenders himself to the Sheriff of Hancock County, who takes him to Carthage, the county seat. At Cathage Jail, Joseph Smith procures a smuggled-in firearm, and also writes letters asking the Nauvoo Legion to come to Carthage and rescue him from jail.

On June 22nd, 1844, a mob painted in black face gathers outside of the jail, then storms it. They kill Hyrum Smith, and wound John Taylor, a Mormon apostle. Joseph Smith fires at the mob with his gun, wounding two. When he is out of bullets, he gives the Masonic sign of distress (raising both arms into squares and saying, "O Lord My God! Is there no help for the widow's son?" Masons promise to come to the aid of other Masons whenever they hear this). Joseph Smith gets out "O Lord My God..." but is shot before he can finish saying the rest. Even though there are Masons in the mob, none come to his aid. He tries to escape out a window, but is shot from the ground. He falls out the window to the ground, and is shot again repeatedly until he is dead.

The Masonic "Grand Hailing Sign of Distress". This sign is given plus the phrase: "O Lord my God! Is there no help for the widow's son?". Joseph Smith learned this when he became a Mason in Nauvoo. Masons are supposed to come to the aid of other Masons when they see this "sign". Joseph Smith attempted this in Carthage Jail, but it did't work.

Joseph Smith had NO intention of dying in Carthage. He did everything to try to prevent that. He tried escaping to Iowa, but was called a "coward" by his closest friends and supporters. He tried calling up the Nauvoo Legion to prevent his arrest. He then wrote to Nauvoo from the jail asking the legion and Marshall of Nauvoo to come get him out of jail! At first he thought the "mob" outside was his rescue party. As the mob stormed the jail, he shot two of the mob members with a "12 shooter" designed by a Mormon named Browning, father of the famous gunsmith.

The reason why Joseph Smith was arrested is because he illegal shut down a newspaper which was revealing that he was secretly a polygamist; a fact that the Mormon Church has admitted as FACT since 1852.

Joseph Smith falling to his death after being shot in the second story window of Carthage Jail (June 22, 1844).


3. How Joseph Smith REALLY Translated The Book of Mormon

Young Mormons are taught that Joseph Smith translated The Book of Mormon in the following manner: he read the symbols on the Gold Plates, prayed about each symbol, then received "Revelation" and then dictated what he received to Oliver Cowdery, who wrote down what Joseph Smith told him in English (B)

The truth is, according to later statements of Martin Harris, Emma Smith, David Whitmer, John Whitmer, and Oliver Cowdery, Joseph Smith had a "seerstone" (a small egg-shapped chocolate colored stone found in a well). He put the seerstone in his hat, covered his face with the hat, and dictated the Book of Mormon to his scribes. The "Gold Plates" were nowhere near when he did this, according to witnesses.


4. DNA and The Book of Mormon

The Book of Mormon claims that the "Lamanites (lay-man-ites), the American Indians, are the descendants of Lehi (lee-high), a Jew. Yet, DNA studies of American Indian tribes reveal they had not one Semitic "gene" in their DNA, no Semitic ancestry whatsoever. The American Indians are Asians, like the Chinese. They have "mongolian folds" in their eyelids as other Asians. They have a "Mongonlian dot" on their tailbones like other Asians. Their hair, languages, skin, eyes, culture, religion, and DNA are all Asian, with NO SEMITIC GENES whatsoever!! They are closely related to the Tuvan people of Siberia. The Book of Mormon teaches that "Lamanites" (i.e. American Indians) have dark skin because God "cursed their skin with darkness" so that the white-skinned Nephites (nee-fights) would not intermarry with them.



DVD from Living Hope Ministries of Brigham City, Utah, on how DNA proves that American Indians have no Jewish ancestry whatsoever. Not one Semitic gene!



5. Archaeology and The Book of Mormon

There is no archaeological evidence for The Book of Mormon. The book says that the Nephites had horses, sheep, goats, oxen, asses, but there is no evidence that oxen, sheep or asses (donkies) existed in the New World before Columbus. Horses in America were too small to ride, and went extinct about 10,000 years ago, long before Book of Mormon times. Not one pot-sherd of "Nephite" civilization has ever been unearthed. NothingZ.

Had the Nephites existed for 1000 years in America, in the millions, they would have tens of millions of oxen, goats, asses, and sheep over this time period. Yet, in The Book of Mormon is true, one must believe that all these animals went exinct in America before Columbus, and did not leave behind one bone or fragment.

Some of the places mentioned in The Book of Mormon, such as Angola, Kishkumen, Oneida, Morin, Alma, Ramah, Jacobugath (Jacobsburg), were names of villages that existed in the time of Joseph Smith, but not in ancient America when the Nephites allegedly existed.

Mormonism began with the "Angel Moroni" who hid the Gold Plates in the "Hill Cumorah". Coincidentally, "Moroni" is the capital of the "Comoro Islands" off the coast of East Africa. In the 19th century, when The Book of Mormon was produced, the Comoro Islands were called the Camore (pronounced "Cumorah") Islands.



Mere coincidence?



6. The Curse of Cain Doctrine and Cover-Up

There have been black Mormons since 1832, although very few of them until after 1978. There is no evidence that Joseph Smith was racist. He allowed black Elders (as long as they were free men), and invited blacks to worship in the Nauvoo Mormon Temple.

But that would change with Brigham Young.

From 1848 until 1978, "Negroes" were banned from all Mormon Temples and the Mormon priesthood (which every Mormon male must hold to get to the Celestial Kingdom). Mormon prophets during this time taught that "Negroes" were the inferior and "cursed" children of Cain, and the "mark of Cain" was a black skin, flat nose, and kinky hair. Here are just a few quotes from Mormon Church leaders (there are hundreds of quotes):


Oliver Cowdery, Second Elder, co-founder of the Mormon Church:
"Let the blacks of the south be free, and our community is overrun with paupers, and a reckless mass of human beings, uncultivated, untaught and unaccustomed to provide for themselves the necessaries of life-endangering the chastity of every female who might by chance be found in our streets-our prisons filled with convicts, and the hang-man wearied with executing the functions of his office!" (Messenger and Advocate, Sept. 11, 1833)
Brigham Young second President and Prophet:

"You see some classes of the human family that are black, uncouth, uncomely, disagreeable and low in their habits, wild and seemingly deprived of nearly all the blessings of the intelligence that is generally bestowed upon mankind. . . . Cain slew his brother. Cain might have been killed, and that would put a termination to that line of human beings. This was not to be, and the Lord put a mark upon him, which was the flat nose and black skin. Trace mankind down to after the flood, and then another cursed is pronounced upon the same race--that they should be the "servants of servants;" and they will be until that curse is removed; and the Abolitionists cannot help it, nor in the least alter that decree (Journal of Discourses, 7:290; emphasis added)
"Shall I tell you the law of God in regard to the African race? If the white man who belongs to the chosen seed mixes his blood with the seed of Cain, the penalty, under the law of God, is death on the spot. This will always be." (Journal of Discourses, 10:110; emphasis added)

"I have never yet preached a sermon and sent it out to the children of man, that they may not call Scripture." (Journal of Discourses, 13:95).
John Taylor, third President and Prophet:
"After the flood we are told that the curse that had been pronounced upon Cain was continued through Ham's wife, as he had married a wife of that seed. And why did it pass through the flood? Because it was necessary that the devil should have a representation upon the earth as well as God. . . ." (ibid., 23:304; emphasis added).

"When he [Satan] destroyed the inhabitants of the antediluvian worlds, he suffered a descendant of Cain to come through the flood in order that he might be properly represented upon the earth." (Journal of Discourses, 23:336; emphasis added)
Wilford Woodruff, who became the fourth President and Prophet of the LDS Church:

"What was that mark? It was a mark of blackness. That mark rested upon Cain, and descended upon his posterity from that time until the present. To day there are millions of the descendants of Cain, through the lineage of Ham, in the world, and that mark of darkness still rest upon them."(Millennial Star, 51:339; emphasis added).

George Reynolds (Apostle):

"We will first inquire into the results of the approbation or displeasure of God upon a people, starting with the belief that a black skin is a mark of the curse of Heaven placed upon some portions of mankind. . . . We understand that when God made man in his own image and pronounced him very good, that he made him white. We have no record of any of God's favored servants being of a black race. . . .When God cursed Cain for murdering his brother Abel, He set a mark upon him that all meeting him might know him. . . . After the flood this curse fell upon the seed of Shem, through the sin of their father, and his descendants bear it to this day. . . .
We are told in the Book of Abraham in the Pearl of Great Price, that Egypt was discovered by a woman, who was a daughter of Ham, the son of Noah. . . . The pure Negro, as represented by the people of Guinea and its neighboring countries, is generally regarded as the unmixed descendant of Ham. . . . Their skin is quite black, their hair woolly and black, their intelligence stunted, and they appear never to have arisen from the most savage state of barbarism (Juvenile Instructor, October 15, 1868, p. 157).
George F. Richards (Apostle):

“The Negro is an unfortunate man. He has been given a black skin. But that is as nothing compared with that greater handicap that he is not permitted to receive the Priesthood and the ordinances of the temple, necessary to prepare men and women to enter into and enjoy a fullness of glory in the celestial kingdom [i.e., godhood].” (Conference Report, April 1939, p. 58)
Joseph Fielding Smith (10th President of the Mormon Church):

"Not only was Cain called upon to suffer, but because of his wickedness he became the father of an inferior race. A curse was place upon him and that curse has been continued through his lineage and must do so while time endures. Millions of souls have come into this world cursed with black skin and have been denied the privilege of Priesthood and the fullness of the blessings of the Gospel. These are the descendants of Cain. Moreover, they have been made to feel their inferiority and have been separated from the rest of mankind from the beginning… we will also hope that blessings may eventually be given to our Negro brethren, for they are our brethren--children of God---notwithstanding their black covering emblematical of eternal darkness." (The Way to Perfection, 101-02; emphasis added).
"There is a reason why one man is born black and with other disadvantages, while another is born white with great advantages... The Negro, evidently, is receiving the reward he merits." (Doctrines of Salvation, 1:61, 66; emphasis added)
Bruce R. McConkie (Mormon Apostle):


"In a broad general sense, caste systems have their root and origin in the gospel itself, and when they operate according to the divine decree, the resultant restrictions and segregation are right and proper and have the approval of the Lord. To illustrate: Cain, Ham, and the whole Negro race have been cursed with a black skin, the mark of Cain, so they can be identified as a caste apart, a people with whom the other descendants of Adam should not intermarry. (Gen. 4; Moses 5.)" (Mormon Doctrine, p.114)
"Though he was rebel and an associate of Lucifer in pre-existence, and though he was a liar from the beginning whose name was Perdition, Cain was cursed with a dark skin; he became the father of the Negroes, and those sprits who are not worthy to receive the priesthood are born though his lineage. He became the first mortal to be cursed as a son of perdition. As a result of his mortal birth he is assured of a tangible body of flesh and bones in eternity, a fact which will enable him to rule over Satan." (Mormon Doctrine, p.104)

"Through Ham (a name meaning black) the blood of the Canaanites was preserved through the flood, he having married Egyptus, a descendent of Cain. Negroes in this life are denied the priesthood; under no circumstances can they hold this delegation of authority from the Almighty." (Mormon Doctrine, p.343)

In 1948, Prof. Lowry Nelson, a liberal Mormon professor, wrote to the Mormon Church First Presidency on June 16, 1947:
"The attitude of the Church in regard to the Negro makes me very sad. I do not believe God is racist."
The First Presidency wrote back to him on July 17th, 1947, saying:
"From the days of the Prophet Joseph Smith even until now, it is has been the doctrine of the Church, never questioned by any of the Church leaders, that the Negroes are not entitled to the full blessings of the Gospel.

"Furthermore, your ideas, as we understand them, appear to contemplate the intermarriage of the Negro and White races, a concept which has heretofore been most repugnant to most normal-minded people from the ancient partiarchs till now. God's rule for Israel, His Chosen People, has been endogamous. Modern Israel has been similarly directed.

"We are not unmindful of the fact that there is a growing tendency, particularly among some educators, as it manifests itself in this are, toward the breaking down of race barriers in the matter of intermarriage between whites and blacks, but it does not have the sanction of the Church and is contrary to Church doctrine.

"Faithfully yours,

[signed]
George Albert Smith J. Reuben Clark, Jr. David O. McKay
The First Presidency"
On August 17th, 1951, the Mormon Church's "First Presidency" issued their official Statement of the First Presidency on the Negro Question in which they stated:
“The attitude of the Church with reference to Negroes remains as it has always stood. It is not a matter of policy but of direct commandment from the Lord, on which is founded the doctrine of the Churchfrom the days of its organization, to the effect that Negroes may become Members of the Church but that they are not entitled to the Priesthood at the present time." (quoted in Mormonism and the Negro, p.16)
That "statement" was the official statement of the Church, signed by all three members of the First Presidency. You simply can't get any more "official" than that.

Beginning in the early 1960s, the Mormon Church increasingly came under criticism for the BAN on Negroes from the priesthood and temples. Universities refused to play sports for Brigham Young University (BYU). Mormon efforts to proselyte in Nigeria were overturned because the Mormon Church was deemed "racist". Many white Americans were refusing to listen to the Mormon missionaries, because the Church was perceived as a "white racist" Church. This perception grew with time.

In 1978, because of external and internal pressures, the Mormon Church president ended this BAN, but never repudiated the "Curse of Cain Doctrine" that Negroes are the cursed children of Cain, and that Cain was changed from a white man to a black man because he killed his brother Abel.

Most Mormons under the age of 20 have never been taught this, and believe YOU ARE LYING if you tell that their Church taught "The Curse of Cain Doctrine" for 130 years. The Mormon Church leaders now want this covered-up, and tell non-mormons, "We never taught that. A few Members believed it, but it was never official doctrine!" That is a BIG LIE. The Curse of Cain Doctrine was taught by the highest Mormon leaders in General Conference, in official letters of the First Presidency, and elsewhere, for 130 years. At no time did they ever call it "opinion". They always referred to it as "a doctrine of the Church". Now, they are trying to cover this up. This is called "The Curse of Cain Cover-Up".



"I just move the Curse of Cain to the little trash can, and that's that!"
A cartoon from a liberal Mormon magazine called Sunstone which spoofs the Church's "Public Relations" attempt to rid itself of the Curse of Cain legacy.

In 1978, the Mormon Church was told that it may lose all Federal Grants to BYU students. Church leaders were also told that the Church might lose its "tax exempt" status, because of the priesthood-ban/temple-ban on blacks. Had the Church lost its tax-exempt status, all of its properties and holdings would be taxed, and Mormon tithe-payers would no longer be able to deduct their donations to the Church from their income taxes.

Also, the Church was building a Temple in Brazil, only to discover that 65% of all white Brazilian Mormons had Negro blood in them; thus disqualifying them from the Priesthood. But all these men had already been ordained to the Priesthood, and included many bishops and Stake Presidents! What to do? Mormon Church President Spencer W. Kimball then claimed a "Revelation" from the Lord ending the 130 year old "ban" on black Mormons holding the priesthood or enterning Mormon Temples. But he did NOT repudiate the "Curse of Cain" doctrine!



Spencer W. Kimball (c.1975)
President of the Mormon Church in 1978. Claimed a "Revelation" lifting the ban on blacks holding the Mormon priesthood or worshipping in Mormon temples. Did not repudiate Curse of Cain Doctrine, the "Negroes" were children of Cain and less valiant in the War in Heaven.

The Curse of Cain Doctrine has NOT yet been repudiated by Church leaders. To repudiate it publicly would mean that the current "Living Prophet" must say that all former Mormons Prophets got it wrong!

Instead of "repudiation" Mormon leaders have opted for "equivocation"; to make misleading statements which deceives the hearer.

Since 1978 black Mormon males are allowed all the priesthood offices, and black Mormons may enter Mormon temples for all the ordinances. The Mormon Church today has 20,000 black Mormons in the U.S., and 200,000 in Africa, and thousands more in the Caribbean. Very few of them know about the Curse of Cain legacy. They are simply never told about it.

On an Australian TV program called "Compass" in 1997, Mormon Church President Gordon B. Hinckley was asked: "What is the reason why blacks were banned from the priesthood and temples before 1978?" Hinckley replied, "Ah...ah...I don't know what the reason for that was!"

He lied.

Hinckley worked for the Church since 1934. He was an Apostle during the 1960s and early 1970s when the the "Negro Question" was discussed almost at every meeting with other Church leaders. He was taught by others, and and taught others, the Curse of Cain Doctrine hundreds of times during his life.


He deliberately lied.


That wouldn't be the first time, nor the last.

African-American and black African converts to the Mormon Church are NEVER told about the Curse of Cain doctrine. If they ask the reason "WHY" blacks were banned from the Mormon Priesthood and Mormon Temples before 1978 they are told, "We don't know why, the Lord never revealed the reason why!" It is suggested now by Mormon apologists that the "reason" was that whites simply were not "ready" for blacks in the priesthood and temples (i.e. white Mormons were too prejudiced against blacks so the LORD, wanting to save blacks from this prejudice, banned them from Mormon temples and priesthood until 1978).

For 130 years, Mormon leaders boldly declared the "reason" why blacks were "banned" was because:

1) They were the ACCURSED and INFERIOR children of Cain, and inherited his "mark". (The Curse of Cain Doctrine)

2) They were "less valiant" in the War in Heaven, and thus were punished by being born in the lineage of Cain.(The Less Valiant Doctrine)

All Mormon leaders from Brigham Young to Spencer W. Kimball taught these two doctrines and referred to them as "doctrines of the Church". Church leaders are now trying to back-peddle on this, and saying, "Golly, we just don't KNOW the reason why!"



President Gordon B. Hinckley. Mormons believe he is their "Living Prophet"; the closest man to God on earth.



7. Oliver Cowdery: the Counterfeiter

Oliver Cowdery was from Vermont. He was a cousin of Joseph Smith Jr. In the mid 1820s he went to Batavia, New York, and worked as a scribe on a book, with William Morgan, called Freemasonry Illustrated; the first anti-Masonic book in the United States. Morgan disappeared, presummably killed by angry Freemasons. Another anti-Mason called Timothy Monroe, was found drowned in Lake Erie. William MORgan and Timothy MONroe became the two "martyrs" of the growing Anti-Masonic Party, which was a new and growing political party in the country. The Anti-Masonic Party referred to Freemasonry as "secret combinations" that would try to overthrow Christianity and the new Republic. Oliver Cowdery was an early Anti-Mason.

After Morgan disappeared, possibly fearing his own safety, Cowdery fled New York State and hid with relatives in Ohio; some of whom lived in the same area as Sidney Rigdon, then a Cambellite preacher in Mentor, Ohio. At the time (1825-27) Rigdon was telling some of his closest friends that a new book of scripture would soon come forth that would unite Christian America, covert the native Indians to Christ, and explain what happened to the mound-builders who had created the thousands of mounds around the eastern part of the country.

After his Ohio stay, Oliver Cowdery went to visit his cousins, the Smith family, living outside of Palmyra, New York. According to Mormon history, this is when Oliver first heard about the visions of Joseph Smith Jr. and that Joseph had "gold plates" containing the Book of Mormon. Cowdery became a scribe to Joseph Smith, and eventually Cowdery became the only other witness along with Joseph Smith, in seeing angels (John the Baptist and Peter, James, and John) restoring the Aaronic and Melchizedek priesthoods to the earth.

Cowdery claimed he wrote The Book of Mormon, except for a few pages only, as the words of the book fell from the lips of Joseph Smith Jr.

Oliver Cowdery became the "Second Elder" of the new "Church of Christ" established in 1830, a year after the Book of Mormon was published. He was the Number 2 Man in the entire Church.

In 1836, in Kirkland, Ohio, Joseph Smith, Sidney Rigdon, and Oliver Cowdery, try to open a new bank called the "Kirkand Safety Society Bank". But they could not get a bank charter. So, they formed the "Kirkland Safety Society Anti-Banking Company". Mormons believed that this new "joint-stock association" was formed by the LORD Himself. They all invested heavily in it. But, only after four months, the KSSABC failed; along with 40% of all financial institutions did, in the "Crash of 1836".

Cowdery was NOT happy! He lost all his money in the KSSABC. He then came out and started telling others that he "found" Joseph Smith having sex with Fanny Algar (his nanny) in a barn. Cowdery referred to it as "a dirty little affair".

Oliver Cowdery, the man who assisted Joseph Smith in translating the Book of Mormon, was excommunicated from the Church in 1836, for claiming that Joseph Smith had committed adultery with Fanny Alger; a young 16 year old girl who worked in the Smith home as a nanny.

Cowdery then moved to Monroe, Michican, and was was soon involved in a counterfeiting venture called "The Bank of Monroe".

In those days, private banks printed their own currency. To be "legal tender" the bank notes had to be based on the "gold standard". This means, for example, a $5 bank note represented $5 worth of gold the bank had. The banks were legally required to print up only as many notes as they had gold to back up the notes. Otherwise, it was counterfeiting. The Bank of Monroe had no gold whatsoever. It was a pure counterfeiting scheme; a pure FRAUD to make money. The cashier of the Bank of Monroe was Oliver CowderyHe deliberately and knowingly forged phoney money. This is not disputed. All Mormon historians know this, and will acknowledge this freely.

The question now is this...

Can his testimony regarding seeing angels with Joseph Smith be trusted?



Mormon paining showing Oliver Cowdery and Joseph Smith receiving the Melchizedek priesthood from the angels Peter, James, and John in 1829.


A $3 from the Bank of Monroe, signed by Oliver Cowdery (1837)

Oliver Cowdery (c.1840)

All Mormon historians KNOW that Oliver Cowdery was a counterfeiter. He pawned off Bank of Monroe currency to people and he KNEW at the time that this currency was NOT backed up by gold. It was worthless. He knew it was.

Should we trust Oliver Cowdery when he said that he saw angels along with Joseph Smith?

After being excommunicated, Cowdery wrote a pamphlet titled A Defense of My Grounds for Separating Myself from the Latter-day Saints, wherein he claimed that the "John the Baptist" who ordained him and Joseph Smith to the Aaronic Priesthood in 1829 "had the voice" of Sidney Rigdon (i.e. he was suggesting to the Reader that Rigdon had deceived him and he was merely an innocent dupe instead of a guilty co-conspirator in religious fraud).

For many years Cowdery tried his hand at being a printer or lawyer, but he was not successful in any endeavor.

In 1847, penniless and with a horrible reputation in the "real" world, Cowdery returned to the Mormon Church, were he was viewed by most Mormons (those who did not know him in the beginning) as a celebrity, and he was promised by Brigham Young to be appointed the "Apostle to the Gentiles". He would get a farm, pension, a high Church position (honorary but dignified), and would be a "rock star" to most younger Mormons who never knew his reputation in the Ohio days of the Church. But he died enroute to Utah of pneumonia.

In 1830, he was the Second Elder, and Joseph Smith the First Elder, of the Mormon Church.

The only two men that claimed to see angels or supernatural visions along with Joseph Smith were Oliver Cowdery and Sidney Rigdon; a man whom we shall soon meet.



8.Changes in the Endowment Ceremony

In order to get to the Celestial Kingdom, Mormons are taught they must go through the "Temple Endowment Ceremony". This is a Masonic-like secret ritual where Mormons must learn secret words, handshakes, and jestures they are told they must use to pass-by sentinel angels on the way to the presence of God the Father in order to receive their Exaltation (becoming Gods and Goddesses) after death. Mormons wear white clothing during the Endowment.

The Endowment Ceremony has changed greatly since it was introduced by Joseph Smith in 1843. Brigham Young made a lot of changes and additions. In the old Endowment Ceremony men and women were washed nude from head to toe (in separate areas), then covered with olive oil from head to toe. This was changed to merely touching certain points with water and oil, then simply sprinkling them with an olive branch.

The original Endowment Ceremony was an eight hour ordeal. Then it was two hours. Finally, just about one hour.

Most of the "Signs and Tokens" form the Endowment Ceremony have parallels to those found in Masonic rites. Joseph Smith became a Master Mason in Nauvoo, although the Book of Mormon says that the Devil originated "secret combinations" and that the Devil leads men by the neck with a flaxen cord (2 Nephi 26:22). In the first degree of Masonry, the candidate is led about blind folded, with a rope made of flax tied around his neck.



In the first Masonic degree, the candidate is led about blindfolded with a flaxen cord tied around his neck.

In the Masonic Oaths once promises to have their throat cut, their heart torn out, and their bowells torn out and fed to birds if they reveal the secrets of Freemasonry. No Mason takes this as literal, but merely "symbolic"; like a Christian would view Jesus' words, "If they right hand offend thee, cut it off" and "If thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out". NO Christian would take this literal. In like manner, no Mason takes the Masonic Oaths literally. The old Mormon Temple oaths were exactly the same as the Masonic Oaths, but they were changed over the decades; watered-down considerably and finally removed completely in 1990.

The Book of Mormon was once called "The Anti-Masonick Bible" because it was filled with Anti-Masonic rhetoric common with the Anti-Masonic Party of the day; a group that Oliver Cowdery belonged to before he helped Joseph Smith.

Before 1990, Temple Patrons (the name given to Mormons who attend the Temple Endowment Ceremony) had to perform a rite called "The Five Points of Fellowship" with a high priest who played the part of "The Lord" standing behind a white veil. This comes directly from Masonic Rite called "The Five Points of Fellowship" that Joseph Smith learned when he was inducted into Freemasonry in Nauvoo:



The Masonic Five Points of Fellowship

In the pre-1990 Mormon Endowment Ceremony Mormon Temple Patrons (men and women) had to "meet the Lord through the veil on the five points of fellowship". They had to embrace a Mormon high priest (playing the part of God) behind a white veil. This ended in 1990, after many young female Patrons complained to Church leaders that the old male Mormon high priests were getting "too frisky" with them during the Five Points of Fellowship part of the Endowment Ceremony.

Before 1990, in the Mormon Temple Endowment Ceremony, Mormons had to make a "sign" of their right thumb passing across their neck in a cutting motion to symbolize what would happen if they revealed the secrets of the Mormon Temple (i.e. their throats being cut).



While this was always viewed as "symbolic" and NEVER taken as a literal threat, this part of the Endowment Ceremony was dropped from all Mormon temple ceremonies in 1990 without explanation from Mormon Church leaders. The Book of Moses, another Revelation to Joseph Smith, teaches that the Devil has men "swear by the throat" (Moses 5:29).

Before 1990, Mormon women in the Endowment Ceremony had to swear obedience to their husbands. This too was removed in 1990, without explanation.

The Endowment Ceremony includes a "film" where actors play God, Jesus, the Devil, Adam and Eve, and Peter, James, and John. Before 1990, there was another charactor in the film, a Protestant minister who was portrayed as a hirling of Satan; who hired the minister to preach. He was removed in 1990, without explanation.

Before 1970, dudring the Mormon Endowment Ceremony one of the actors in the Mormon Temple Endowment Ceremony said the Devil was "black". That comment was removed in 1970.

If the Endowment Ceremony was a Revelation from God, then WHY did it need to be changed?



9. The 1891 Prophecies of Joseph Smith

Joseph Smith prophesied "in the name of the Lord and let it be written" that Christ would return in 1891. He prophesied this on two separate occassions. In February of 1835, Joseph Smith addressed a group of Mormon elders who were going to march to Jackson County, Mission (Zion) to defend other Mormons from Missour mobs:
"President Smith then stated that the meeting had been called, because God had commanded it; and it was made known to him by vision and by the Holy Spirit. He then gave a revelation of some of the circumstances attending us while journeying to Zion...our trial, sufferings; and said God had not designed all this for nothing, but He had it in remembrance yet; and it was the will of God that those who went to Zion, with a determination to lay down their lives, if necessary, should be ordained to the ministry, and go forth to prune the vineyard for the last time, or the coming of the Lord, which was nigh—even fifty-six years would wind up the scene." History of the Church, Vol. 2, p. 182.
Add 1835 to 56 and one gets 1891.

In Volume 7 (the Index) of the Documentary History of the Church, published by the Church, under "Second Coming" one reads this:
"Joseph said would be in 56 years V2:182"
On April 6th, 1843, Joseph Smith wrote:
"I was once praying earnestly upon the subject, and a voice said unto me, My son, if thou livest till thou art 85 years of age, thou shalt see the Face of the Son of Man--I was left to draw my own conclusions concerning this & took the liberty to conclude that if I did live till that time He would make His appearance or I shall go where He is--I prophesy in the name of the Lord God--& let it be written, that the Son of Man will not come in the heavens till I am 85 years old, 48 years hence or about 1890." (Diary of Joseph Smith, April 6, 1843, quoted in The Revelations of Joseph Smith, p.345)
Add 1843 to 48 years and one comes to 1891.

Some Mormon apologists call this "Not a prophecy at all, he was just giving an off-the-cuff remark!"

Others say, "Well, Jesus WOULD have come if Joseph Smith lived to age 85, but since he didn't, the Lord did not come. The prophecy was conditional".

But that doesn't work. The prophecy did NOT say: "The Lord shall come IF you live to 85". The prophecy said:"The Lord shall come in 48 years from now (1891), and if you (Joseph) live till then, you'll see His face!"

When confronted with this, Mormons reply, "Well, its NOT a false prophecy. It would have happened then, but we weren't ready for it!" The Bible says that the sign of a false prophet is ONE prophecy that does not come to pass:

"When a prophet speaks in the name of the LORD, if the word does not come to pass or come true, that is a word which the LORD has not spoken; the prophet has spoken it presumptuously, you need not be afraid of him" (Deuteronomy 18:22)



Joseph Smith prophesied, twice, that Christ would return in 1891. What happened?

How many UNfulfilled prophecies can a "true" prophet give? The Bible says: NONE!



10. The Doctrines of Brigham Young

Today, the Mormon Church reveres Brigham Young as the successor of Joseph Smith, and a Prophet of God. Yet, the Mormon Church repudiated most of the unique doctrines of Brigham Young, and is in the process of repudiating more. Brigham Young taught:

*Negroes are the cursed and inferior children of Cain and cannot hold the Priesthood or enter Mormon temples until the curse is removed. (JD 7:290)

*The Civil War will NOT free the Negroes (JD 10:250)

*Interracial couples should be killed along with their children. (JD 10:110)

*Mary was the daughter/wife of God the Father. (JD 4:218)

*Some sins must be atoned by having the sinner killed and his own blood spilled on the ground. (JD 4:215-221)

*The Sun and Moon are inhabited just as this earth. (JD 13:217)

*The Millennium commenced in 1845 (T&S 6:12:956)

*Only polygamists become gods. (JD 3:266)

*Nobody can enter the Celestial Kingdom without Joseph Smith's permission. (JD 7:289)

*The Latter-day Saints will go back to Jackson County, Missouri, and build the City of Zion before all those alive in 1832 have passed-away (JD 6:956)

*All his published sermons should be considered as Scripture.(JD 13:264)

*Adam is the Father of our spirits and the father of the spirit and body of Jesus Christ. (JD 1:50-51)

Mormon Church leaders have, in recent decades, repudiated just about all of these doctrines, and seem in the process of repudiating them all.

Brigham Young, the 2nd President of the Mormon Church, taught that Adam was the Father of our spirits, and the Father of the spirit and body of Jesus Christ. This is known as "The Adam-God Doctrine". Today, if a Mormon teaches that, he is excommunicated. He also taught that the Sun and Moon were inhabited just like earth, and that the City of New Jerusalem would be built in Jackson County, Missouri, before all those living in 1832 were dead. He also taught that the Civil War would NOT free the Negro, whom he believed was under a "curse" to be the servants of whites until God removed the curse. He legalized African and Indian slavery in Utah in 1850 which only ended with President Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation in 1863.



Brigham Young taught this was God's curse upon the Negro; to serve the white man until God removed the curse.

If Mormon Church leaders said "Brigham Young was a false prophet" that would undermine their own authority, because they are the successors of Brigham Young. So, they have it "both ways". They have the "best of both worlds". They continue to call Brigham Young a "Prophet of God" but, at the same time, they repudiate most of his teachings.



11. The Actions of Brigham Young

Brigham Young, the 2nd President of the Mormon Church, owned a beer hall in Salt Lake City. He also owned distillerites and tobacco farms in southern Utah, and sold tens of thousands of dollars of whisky and tobacco to Gentiles (non-mormons) each year, at the same time he was ordering Mormons NOT to buy or sell to Gentiles (jen-tiles). At the same time he commanded Mormons NOT to buy or sell from Gentiles (non-mormons) in Utah, he was in fact selling massive quantities of wine, beer, whiskey, and tobacco to Gentiles in Utah Territory and elsewhere.

William Hickman, a former bodyguard of Brigham Young, later wrote a book wherein he claimed that Young ordered the murders of many people who defied him or insulted him in some way.



William Hickman. Former bodyguard of Brigham Young

During the time of Brigham Young, half of all Utah Mormon females were the plural wives of Mormon leaders, from bishops on up. It was not uncommon for a 60 year old Mormon bishop to be married to his first wife, about his age, but also to several teen-age girls, and a widow woman and her daughters, all at the same time!

Mormon leaders justified polygamy by saying God commanded it,and that it "eliminated prostitution" (really...they said that). Reality was just the opposite. Seymour B. Young, a Presiding Seventy and one of the many sons of Brigham Young (he had 56 children), wrote in 1871:
"Salt Lake City has for the first time in its history houses of ill fame almost on every corner." (Mormon Hierarchy 2:767)
Many of the brothels were owned by Brigham Young.

Half of all Mormon men in Utah could not find a girl for marriage, because Mormon leaders had married 50% of them. One 58 year old Mormon bishop who was courting a 15-year old Mormon girl found the girl kissing a 17-year old boy in a barn. He had the boy castrated. The boy went crazy and was sent to an insane asylum. Nothing happened to the bishop. Things such as this were not uncommon in Utah at that time.

A former friend of Brigham Young, Thomas B.H. Stenhouse, left the Church and wrote a book titled "Rocky Mountain Saints" claiming that Brigham Young stole hundreds of thousands of dollars from the Tithing Office each year; a place where mostly poor Mormon farmers would give 10% of their income to the Church for the care of the poor and the building of the Kingdom of God on earth. Brigham Young died one the wealthiest men in America at that time. Where did he get all the money? Did Church President pay that well?



Brigham Young (1865)
Prophet or Pimp?



12. The Fastest Growing Religion on Earth?

Mormons claim theirs is the fastest growing Church in the world and that growth is a "sign" from God that the Church is true. Non-sense. The Mormon Church is growing much slower than the SDA Church, the Jehovah's Witnesses, or the Assemblies of God, among many more. For example, the Mormon Church grows at about a rate of 4% per year, while the Assemblies of God grows at a rate of about 9% per year. Why do Mormons think they have the fastest growing religion on earth? Are the Assemblies of God and the other churches "TRUER" than the Mormon Church? All of them are growing MUCH faster, and with far fewer missionaries.



Even with 60,000 full-time missionaries, the Mormon Church only grows at 4% per year: far behind other American-based churches.



13. The Doctrine of Heavenly Incest

For many decades Mormon leaders taught that God the Father, an exalted white man with a human body, came down and had sex with Mary, one of his spirit-daughters, in order to produce the body of Jesus. Mary was a "virgin" in the sense that she had sex with God and not with man. Mormon leaders taught that sex with God was the same as a man having sex with his own wife. They taught Mary is the daughter-wife of God the Father. This "Heavenly Incest Doctrine" has never been repudiated. Many older Mormons, over the age of 50, still believe this doctrine. Many younger Mormons have never heard of it.



Mormon prophets taught that Jesus was conceived in the same way and same manner as all human beings are, and that God the Father, an exalted white man, "came down" and "joined" with Mary, his own spirit-daughter, to "sire" Jesus in the same way men sire sons.

There have been tens of thousands of Mormon women in the past ten years who have claimed their Mormon fathers raped them when they were young girls or teens. Beginning in the early 1980s, many women were discovering they could "sue" their fathers for sexual exploitation when they were young girls or teens. Many Mormon women were coming forward with allegations against their fathers. Many of these men were now high priests, some of them bishops or former bishops. Some Stake Presidents, high counsellors, or formerly so.

The LDS Church had to start an "800" number for these women to call; NOT because they were so concerned with the "problem" but because they wanted to keep the women from going to the Press or Court, which would embarass the Church. At first these men denied all, but when two or more daughters came forward with the same allegations, local Church authorities started to hold Church Courts on these men. Most were not excommunicated, but simply put on Church "probation" (a slap on the wrist). I know of dozens of cases where Mormon women told thier bishops that their good Mormon fathers raped them as children or teens, just to have the bishop call these women "liars".

Mormon men want to become God the Fathers, and, in Mormonism, God the Father is an exalted white man who, along with multiple wives, sometimes "steps down from His throne" to have sex with a spirit-daughter, to produce a Savior for a fallen world he has created. This sort of doctrine seems to "inspire" many Mormon fathers to "jump the gun" and begin at home what they plan to do in the eternities.



14. The Kinderhook Plates Hoax

In 1843 a group of men in Kinderhook, Illinois, decided to deceive Joseph Smith and prove him a false prophet. They forged small bell-shaped plates of brass, covered them with rust and symbols, then buried them, then dug them up again (inviting Mormons to the dig) and took them to Joseph Smith to translate. Joseph Smith claimed to "translate a portion of them" and found them to contain a genealogy of a Jaredite (a Book of Mormon people) back to Pharoah, son of Ham. This is known as the "Kinderhook Plates Hoax". How can a true Prophet translate phoney brass plates?



Only a phoney prophet can translate phoney plates.



15. The Fate of Disobedient Mormon Wives

Mormon prophets have taught, and Mormen men believe, that they shall have many wives in Heaven, including some of their own spirit-daughters. Obedient Mormon women must accept this, or never be resurrected. Mormon males are told they will have the right to resurrect their wives in the resurrection. If a Mormon women is disobedient to her husband, the husband may leave her in the grave. Since Mormon men believe they will have many wives in heaven (including perhaps some of their own spirit-daughters) so leaving a disobedient wife in her grave does not mean Mormon men will be alone for eternity. Mormon women MUST accept this, and be faithful and active in the Mormon Church all their lives, or face NEVER seeing their children or loved ones again for all eternity.

The Mormon Church claims it outlawed "plural marriage" (polygamy) in 1890. This is NOT true! Church leaders and their friends and family continued to engage in plural marriages up until the 1920s; although it became increasingly rare. At the same time, Church leaders denied they were authorizing any plural marriages. They saw this as "Lying for the Lord"; which for Mormons is perfectly justified deception.

Even though the Mormon Church publicly condemns polygamy, Mormon men believe they will have many wives in the Celestial Kingdom.



The Mormon Church decries polygamy today, but Mormon men are told if they are "faithful" (i.e. unquestioningly obedient to Church leaders) they will have multiple wives in the Celestial Kingdom (Heaven). This is what motivates many Mormon men! Perhaps even most.



16. The Seductions of Joseph Smith

According to Sarah Pratt, wife of Mormon apostle Orson Pratt, Joseph Smith tried to seduce her while Orson Pratt was on a mission to England. According to Nancy Rigdon, the sixteen year old daughter of Sidney Rigdon, a leading Mormon at the time, Joseph Smith tried to seduce her too.

According to Oliver Cowdery, who was the co-founder of the Mormon Church along with Joseph Smith, he caught Joseph Smith having sex with Fanny Alger in a barn. Fanny was a 16 year old nanny that took care of the Smith children, in Kirkland, Ohio, in 1835.

Most Mormons are not aware of this. Mormon historians are aware of it, but say, "He had the authority to do this because the Lord commanded him to take additional wives".

Yet, all his life, Joseph Smith publicly declared "he was NOT a polygamist". He even had Mormons who preached polygamy excommunicated, publicly! He publicly renounced polygamy many times, and declared he had only one wife in all his writings and public statements. At the same time, he was "marrying" as many women as he could, all young and beautiful, in secret ceremonies, telling the women to "tell nobody". Some of these women already were married, with husbands at home.

Doctrine and Covenants section 132, which commands plural marriage, was never published during Joseph Smith's lifetime. It did not appear until 1856, 12 years after the death of Joseph Smith.

Mormons are told that Joseph Smith did not WANT to take additional wives, but an angel with a flaming sword appeared to him and threatned to kill him if he did not obey. What else could he do?



Joseph Smith cowers against a tree (below left) as an angel with a flaming sword warns him to take additional wives "or else". This is what Joseph Smith told his many "wives". Could YOU say "NO!" to an angel with a flaming sword?




17. Joseph Smith's Boast

In May 1844, Joseph Smith boasted he had "done more than any man" in holding the Church together, more than Paul OR JESUS ever did. He said: "I am the only man that has ever been able to keep a whole church together since the days of Adam. A large majority of the whole have stood by me. Neither Paul, John, Peter, nor Jesus ever did it. I boast that no man ever did such a work as I. The followers of Jesus ran away from Him; but the Latter-day Saints never ran away from me yet." -Joseph Smith, Jr., History Of The Church, VI:408-409



Joseph Smith appointed himself Lt. Gen of the Nauvoo Legion



18. Who Really Wrote the Book of Mormon?

According to the Mormon Church, The Book of Mormon was written by an ancient Nephite prophet named Mormon, who lived somewhere in the American continents, about 350 to 400 A.D. He wrote on tablets of gold an abridgement of the "Record of the Nephites". His son, Moroni, finished the work and hid the gold plates (tablets) in a hill in upstate New York, near the Joseph Smith farm in Manchester, New York. As an Angel, Moroni told Joseph Smith in 1826 where to find the gold plates, and Joseph Smith, by the power of God, translated this record into The Book of Mormon.

However, according to numerous witnesses who lived at the time of Joseph Smith, including the widow and daughter and brother of one Rev. Solomon Spalding, formerly of Pittsburg. Rev. Spaulding was a disabled minister who had several failed business ventures. Constantly in need of more money, he wrote novels, hoping to publish and sell them as a means of additional income. One was called "Manuscript Found at Conneaut Creek" (rediscovered at Oberlin College in 1901). He could not publish that novel, so he wrote a later novel that was called"Manuscript Found in the Wilds of Mormon" (he wrote the novel because he needed MORMONey); a reworking of the first manuscript. He took the manuscript to a printer in Pittsburg, who said he would publish it if Spaulding paid for its printing. Spaulding spent the next year or so trying to find a backer to print the book, and both would share the profits, but he died before he could find a financier.

After Spaulding died, the printer left the manuscript on a shelf in the printing office, collecting dust. According to Spaulding's widow and daughter and brother, the Book of Mormon was based upon the second novel by Solomon Spaulding called "Manuscript Found in the Wilds of Mormon". They swore in affidavit that the novel contained an account of the "Nephites" and "Lamanites" and the names "Lehi" and "Mormon" and "Moroni" were included in the work. They claimed that Sidney Rigdon stole this manuscript from a printer's office in Pittsburg in 1822, added a lot of additional "religious" materials, and with it wrote The Book of Mormon, with Joseph Smith being the "front man" for this venture. Both Spaulding's widow and his daughter testified of this in sworn affidavits. Mormon apologists claim that the memories of Spaulding's widow and daughter were faulty and that they merely confused The Book of Mormon with Solomon's lost manuscript.

Spaulding's first manuscript, "Manuscript Found at Conneaut Creek", was rediscovered in 1901 at Oberlin College. This first manuscript has no parallel to The Book of Mormon. Spaulding's widow and daughter claim that it was his SECOND manuscript, the one stole by Rigdon, that formed the basis for The Book of Mormon.

Did Sidney Rigdon write The Book of Mormon based upon Spaulding's second manuscript? We don't know for sure. The Manuscript disappeared. But we DO know this, that the "Lectures on Faith" (part of the Doctrine and Covenants before 1904) which purportedly were authored by Joseph Smith, were in fact authored by Sidney Rigdon. Mormons scholars did computer "word studies" on the "Lectures on Faith" and discovered they were penned not by Joseph Smith, but by Sidney Rigdon. Joseph Smith claimed that the "Lectures on Faith" were a Revelation to him, but in fact they were written by Sidney Rigdon, a former Cambellite preacher. The Book of Mormon confirms Cambellite doctrine as true, such as free will, no infant baptism, baptism by total immersion, one must be born-again to be saved, salvation by grace, etc.

The Book of Mormon teaches Campbellism! Sidney Rigdon was a Campbellite preacher. The Book of Mormon contains many teachings that "Mormonism" of today does NOT teach, such as:

*There is only ONE God Who is a Great Spirit (Alma 11:26-30)
*The Father and the Son are "one God" (Alma 11:28)

*Hell is eternal in duration (Jacob 3:11, 2 Nephi 19:16)

*One must be "born again" to inherit the kingdom of heaven (Alma 5:24)

*Salvation is by grace alone (2 Nephi 7:42)

*Once a person is dead it is too late for them to repent and they are eternally judged (Alma 34:34, 2 Nephi 9:38, Mosiah 2:36-39).

*Mary conceived via the Holy Ghost and is called a "virgin" both before and after Jesus is born (Alma 7:10)

*Polygamy is sinful and an abomination before God (Jacob 2:24).

The Book of Mormon teaches pure "Campbellism"; new a form of American Protestantism in the U.S. at the time of Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon, who was a Campbellite minister. Today, Campbellism is called "Evangelical Christianity" and is currently the most popular form of Protestant Christianity in the world.

Before Campbellism, Protestant Christians believed they must be "good" to be saved, that the Blood of Jesus washed their sins away only if they believed and understood a number of doctrines, led moral lives, were baptized in the proper way, and were in "good standing" with a Protestant Church. One had to die in a "state of grace" to be saved (i.e. being obedient to one's minister and contributing financially to the local church and active in it). Otherwise, they would burn in Hell forever. They believed many things which "Evangelical Christians" would find "legalistic" or even "heretical" today.

However, in the 1820 there arose one Alexander Campbell, a Baptist preacher, who, along with his brother, started a new Movement of Christians called the "Christian Resoration Movement". They rejected any name but "Christian" or "Disciples of Christ". They rejected the need for baptism, or the belief in creeds, or belonging to an organized Protestant Church, or even living a morally clean life as "prerequisites" for salvation. They taught that God's grace alone saves us via the "born again" experience based upon a formula of a "conviction of sin" then repentence, then calling upon the Lord for salvation, then being "born again". The Campbellites believed that they were restoring "Primitive Christianity" to the Earth. They believed that it was wrong to call oneself "Baptist" or "Lutheran" or "Calvinist" because these were the names of men. They taught that they should only call themselves "Christians". All was considered "radical" and even "heretical" by most of the Protestant churches at the time. Another Baptist minister who joined the new "Christian" movement was Sidney Rigdon.

Mormons do NOT believe ANY of the Campbellite doctrines found in The Book of Mormon, even though The Book of Mormon clearly teaches them. Mormons are taught to believe:

*There are many Gods and Goddesses.
*Hell is NOT eternal in duration.
*Salvation is a "reward" of God for those who have received the ordinances of the Church along with obeying Church leaders to the end of their lives.
*Once a person has died they still have the opportunity to repent, be baptised, and to be saved and exalted.
*The Father and the Son are two separate Gods.
*Mary did NOT conceive by the Holy Ghost, but rather "conceived" when God the Father came down and "joined" with her and "sired" Jesus in the same way that mortal men sire mortal sons.
*Polygamy is NOT sinful if commanded by the LORD, and faithful Mormon men "may" become polygamists in heaven.

Although The Book of Mormon says "ye must needs be born again" Mormons totally ignore this and believe that being "saved" by grace is "foolishness". They believe they save themselves and exalt themselves via their own "worthiness" (i.e. righteousness) by being active faithful Members of the Church throughout their lives.

It is highly ironic that Evangelicals REJECT The Book of Mormon, which clearly teaches Evangelicalism while at the same time Mormons say they believe that The Book of Mormon is "the Word of God" while, at the same time, they REJECT most of its doctrines; believing and teaching just of the opposite of what the Book of Mormon teaches in many instances!

The Book of Mormon contains NONE of the later teachings of Joseph Smith, such as God once being a man, one must know certain secret "signs and tokens" to be Exalted, Hell is only temporary, men and women may become Gods and Goddesses, salvation for the dead, baptism for the dead, etc.

Joseph Smith got many of his "Navuoo Doctrines" from his two Hebrew teachers, both Sephardic Jews who taught him doctrines from the Kaballah (Mystical Judaism).

Lorenzo Saunders, a boyhood friend of Joseph Smith, later claimed that Rigdon was on the Smith farm in 1826, four years BEFORE Rigdon claims to have met Joseph Smith or heard of The Book of Mormon. Was Rigdon the author of The Book of Mormon and the true founder of Mormonism? Spaulding's daughter, his widow, and a physician named Dr. Cephas Dodd, who was Spaulding's friend and neighbor, all swore in affadavits that The Book of Mormon was based upon Spaulding's "Manuscript Found in the Wilds of Mormon"; a manuscript, with no copies, that was taken from the Patterson Print Shop in Pittsburg at the time Rigdon used to visit his friend (a printer named Lambdin) at that shop.

Spaulding's widow and daughter and brother testified that Solomon and Sidney knew each other, something declared impossible by Mormon apologists for many years. Yet, the following from the Pittsburg newspaper for 1816, shows letters at the post office for Rigdon and Spaulding:



In 1816, Pittsburg was a small village.

After loosing "guardianship" to the Church to Brigham Young after the death of Joseph Smith, Sidney Rigdon founded his own "Church of Christ" back in Pittsburg, claimed and wrote many "Thus saith the LORD" Revelations. But he eventually was defrocked by his own followers, who abandoned his Revelations as untrustworthy, but retained belief in The Book of Mormon. That Church still exists today, and is called "The Church of Jesus Christ" and has 12,000 members worldwide.

Rigdon, in later life, abandoned by his own followers for being deceitful, abandoned religion altogether.

In 1884, R. W. Alderman swore an affidavit stating that he met Martin Harris (friend of Joseph Smith and financier of the first edition of The Book of Mormon) at a snowed in hotel in Mentor, Ohio, in 1852. Harris had been excommunicated in Kirtland Ohio in 1836 for calling Joseph Smith a "fallen prophet" because Joseph Smith's bank ("Kirkand Safety Society Anti-Banking Company") had failed; ruining most of its investors, including Harris. Alderman claims that during the night (they shared the same hotel room because they had to) Harris admitted to him that Sidney Rigdon was the true author of The Book of Mormon, having stolen a manuscript from a print shop in Pittsburg. He said:
"Harris was there, and in conversation told me he saw Jo Smith translate the 'Book of Mormon,' with his peep-stone in his hat. Oliver Cowdery, who had been a school-teacher, wrote it down. Sidney Rigdon, a renegade preacher, was let in during the translation. Rigdon had stolen a manuscript from a printing office in Pittsburgh, Pa., which Spaulding, who had written it in the early part of the century, had left there to be printed, but the printers refused to publish it, but Jo and Rigdon did, as the 'Book of Mormon.' Martin said he furnished the means, . . . .'"(Davis, Scales, and Cowdery, Who Really Wrote The Book of Mormon?, 1977, p. 145)
Others who swore affidavits saying the exact same thing as Alderman were:

*Matilda Spaulding Davison (Solomon Spaulding's widow)
*John Spaulding (his surviving brother)
*Marth Spaulding (wife of John Spaulding)
*Henry Lake (business partner of Solomon Spaulding)
*John N. Miller (employee of Solomon Spaulding)
*Oliver Smith (employee)
*Nehum Howard (next door neighbor of Solomon Spaulding)
*Artemus Cunningham (neighbor and friend)
*Aaron Wright (neighbor and friend) *Dr. Cephas Dodd (Spaulding's neighbor and physician)

All "swore" on the Bible that the names "Lehi" and "Nephi" and "Lamanites" and "sword of Laban" were all contained in "Manuscript Found in the Wilds of Mormon"; Spaulding's second "lost" manuscript.

Mormon apologists tell people that "the Spaulding-theory of the origin of The Book of Mormon is DEAD" because "Spaulding's manuscript Manuscript Found was re-discovered in 1901 in the basement of Oberlin College, and it has nothing in common with The Book of Mormon!"

Even most Mormon apologists are unaware that Spaulding wrote two manuscripts not one only:

*The First Manuscript: "Manuscript Found at Conneaut Creek" (found at Oberlin in 1901)

*The Second Manuscript: "Manuscript Found in the Wilds of Mormon" (left at the Patterson Printing Office in Pittsburg and "lost" or stolen by Rigdon).

It is true that the first manuscript has little or no resemblance to The Book of Mormon, but nobody ever claimed it did in the first place! Still, there is some similarity in some "wording" between the first manuscript and The Book of Mormon, such as this:



A comparison of a line from Spaulding's first manuscript ("It is impossible to describe the horror of the bloody scene, the blood & carnage" )and a line in The Book of Mormon (Mormon 5:8).

We cannot compare the second manuscript with The Book of Mormon, because the second manuscript (like the first) had no copies, and the original was stolen, by Sidney Rigdon, if one is to believe the widow, daughter, brother, and physician of Solomon Spaulding.

At least a dozen people swore in affidavits before Justices of the Peace (like notarized statements today) that knew for a FACT that Sidney Rigdon stole a manuscript titled "Manuscript Found from the Wilds of Mormon", written by the late Rev. Solomon Spaulding, from a printing shop in Pittsburg around 1816-1822, and this manuscript formed the "basis" for The Book of Mormon story.

Where they "all" LIARS?

None of these dozen people made money from their affidavits. None of them wrote books. On the other hand, the three men intimately involved in the coming forth of The Book of Mormon (Sidney Rigdon, Joseph Smith, and Oliver Cowdery) hoped the Book of Mormon would become a best-seller, and tried to sell the book for $5 per copy (the equivolent of $75 today). When that failed, Joseph Smith had Oliver Cowdery go to Canada to try to sell the copyright of The Book of Mormon. Of course, nobody was interested. The Book of Mormon read, as Mark Twain would later write, "chloroform in print". It put people to sleep (many Mormons born into the Church still have never read the book cover to cover!). Reading The Book of Mormon from cover to cover is such a grueling ordeal that even Mormon missionaries are given a year to accomplish this herculean task.

When selling The Book of Mormon failed, the three friends (Rigdon, Smith, and Cowdery) open up a bank in Kirkland Ohio. It fails! Oliver Cowdery, angered at Joseph Smith, tells others that he caught Joseph engaged in sex with Fannie Alger, Joseph's nanny. Cowdery is disfellowshipped from the Church, and moves to Michigan.

In Monroe, Cowdery opens up an illegal bank and issues bank notes he knows are worthless (bank notes in those days were considered legal tender "if" they were backed by gold coin...the Bank of Monroe notes were not backed by gold coin) then flees Michigan to avoid the law. Rigdon and Smith flee to Missouri to avoid Ohio authorities who want to jail them for openning a non-chartered bank in Kirkland.

Can you see the Big Picture here?

In Missouri, apostate Mormons all claim that Joseph Smith formed an organization called "The Danites" in order to "spoil the Gentiles" (i.e. steal from non-mormons). One of those who makes this claim is John Whitmer, one of the "11 Witnesses" of The Book of Mormon. The Danites also threaten apostate Mormons to leave the state or face death.

In response to that and other things, the Missourians start a war against the Mormons, and Joseph Smith is arrested. He is rescued, and the Mormons flee to Illinois where they build Nauvoo. Joseph Smith gets rich selling the land to his followers, and builds a mansion, a red-brick store, and the "Nauvoo House" for the boarding of strangers, all in his name. In Nauvoo he becames a Freemason, which shocks some older Mormons who know the The Book of Mormon teaches against "secret combinations".

Soon after becoming a Freemasonry Joseph Smith introduces the Endowment to a select few Mormon friends, which he calls "Celestial Masonry". He also introduces more and more of these "friends" to the concept of polygamy; which he is, at the same time, publicly condemning.

Joseph Smith and William Law are appointed "Guardians" of two young sisters. When Law discovers that Joseph is sleeping with both of them, and has confescated their inheritance, he confronts Joseph, who tells him basically, "Get used to it!" Law then plots to publicly expose Joseph Smith as a "fallen prophet" and then take over the Church with David Whitmer (who left the Church during the Kirkland years) as the new "Prophet".

And the rest, as they say, is "history".

Martin Harris, the financier of the first edition of The Book of Mormon, who called Joseph Smith a "fallen prophet" after the Kirkland Bank failure of 1836, did return to the Mormon Church. At age 80, in financial ruin and with no money or pension, he asked Brigham Young to take him in. He died in Utah a few years later.


 
Sidney Rigdon (left) Martin Harris (right)

Both Rigdon and Harris had, in their lifetimes, referred to Joseph Smith as "a fallen prophet".



19. No Paid Ministry???

The Mormon Church prides itself that it has "no paid ministry"; suggesting that being paid to preach is a great sin. However, in 1834, Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon asked their followers for salaries of $1000 a year each, a huge sum at that time equaling about $80,000 per year today, at a time when Mormons were very poor. Today, Mormon leaders are paid very good salaries, which are "secret" (why?). Mormons leaders also sit on various "Boards" of companies owned by the Church and supported by tithing money. They receive huge amounts of "fees" from attending a few Board meetings per year. Again, the amount they receive is "secret". Why? Rank-and-file Mormons are expected to pay tithing plus "fast offerings" plus every Ward (congregation) has various "funds" in addition to that such as the "Building Fund" the "Missionary Fund" etc.

The average faithful Mormon pays about 20% of his income (before taxes) to the Church in tithing/offerings/funds. Mormon families are also expected to send their sons on two-year missions, and pay for this out of their own pockets.

Why do Mormon leaders keep the financial statements of the Church "secret"? What do they want to hide?


"The Brethren". The 15 Apostles who lead the Mormon Church. Mormons believe they are the closest men to God on earth. Totally honest, and totally moral. Mormons believe they are Prophets, Seers, and Revelators; although they do NOT prophesy/see/revelate. Why are their salaries and income from the various "Boards" they sit on a closely guarded secret?

Why are Mormons asked to "sustain the Brethren" as "Prophets/Seers/Revelators" twice each year in General Conference when in fact they DO NOT prophesy, they DO NOT see supernatural visions, and they DO NOT receive "Thus saith the LORD" Revelations?

Why are Church financial records "secret"?

What are they trying to hide?



20. The Mark Hofmann Episode

In April of 1980, a Mormon named Mark Hofmann claimed to discover some old Mormon documents. At first, these documents seemed to confirm Mormon history. Hofmann sold his documents to Mormon collectors and to the Mormon Church itself, for great sums of money.



However, Hofmann soon began "discovering" old Mormon documents that made Joseph Smith and Brigham Young look very, very bad! Hofmann secretly sold many of these documents to Gordon B. Hinckley, who was the Acting President of the Church at that time (the other members of the First Presidency being senile). Hofmann sold many documents SECRETLY to President Hinckley, face to face, over a five year period, for great amounts of money.



The Church arranged for Hofmann a $185,000 "secret loan" from First Interstate Bank so that Hofmann could purchase a collection of damning letters from one of the original apostles of Joseph Smith, so they could hide the documents and keep them out of public knowledge.

In October 15th 1985, two Mormons, Steve Christensen and Kathy Sheets were blown up and killed by pipe-bombs. The next day, Mark Hofmann himself was seriously injured by a pipe-bomb, while getting something out of his car.



Hofmann's burnt-out and bombed-out car (Oct. 16th, 1985)

Police and ATF immediately suspected Hofmann as the bomber. They proved that Hofmann dropped his own bomb while taking it out of his car. When they told this to President Hinckley, he replied: "You're got the wrong man! Hofmann is innocent!"

After Hofmann was arrested for double-homicide, his bishop and entire Elder's Quorum in the Ward he belonged to wrote and signed a letter attesting Mark was innocent. Mark's father then claimed he received a Revelation from God: Mark was innocent. During the months Hofmann was out on bail, and back in his home Ward on Sunday, many people, during Fast and Testimony Meeting (first Sunday of every month) came up and testified that they "knew Mark was innocent just like they knew the Church was true." Why? God told them so!

About a year later, after massive amounts of investigation and forensic work, investigators proved that Hofmann had FORGED the documents. They were all fakes he created in his basement. To avoid the death penalty, Hofmann eventually confessed to the forgeries and murders. He murdered Christensen and Sheets as a way to cover-up his forgery scheme. He was on his way to murder a third innocent person, when he accidently dropped his own bomb! He has been in the Utah State Prison since 1986, and will probably be there the rest of his life.

A number of books were written about this, including "THE MORMON MURDERS". CBS was planning to do a miniseries on "The Mormon Murders" but Mormon Church lawyers met in closed door sessions with CBS executives, and then CBS dropped plans to make the miniseries.



The Murder Murders can be ordered from any bookstore, Amazon.com, and can be found in most public libraries in the United States.

Mormons are taught from birth that "The Brethren" are Prophets/Seers/Revelators, and that they can read the hearts and intents of all people, and that nobody can "fool" them because they are men of God.

Why couldn't any of the leaders of the Church use their Spirit of Discernment to "discern" that Hofmann was deceiving them?

Where was their "discernment"?




21. The Book of Abraham

In 1838 Joseph Smith bought some Egyptian papyrus, brought to him by a man who had inherited this papyrus from his uncle who had been to Egypt. Joseph Smith claimed the papyrus included "The Book of Joseph of Egypt" and "The Book of Abraham" and some epitaphs. He "translated" some of the Book of Abraham from the papyrus, and this "Book of Abraham" now forms part of Mormon scripture, along with the Book of Mormon and the "Doctrine and Covenants" and "The Book of Moses".



Part of the original Joseph Smith Papyrus
The original papyrus was lost after the Mormons left Nauvoo, Illinois.

But, in 1967, an Egyptian-American professor, Dr. Aziz Atiya, discovered the original papyrus owned by Joseph Smith in the 1830s in the University of Chicago museum.



Dr. Aziz Atiya (middle) smiles while the curator of the University of Chicago (right) hands the Joseph Smith Papyrus to N. Eldon Tanner (left) of the Mormon Church's First Presidency (1967)
Dr. Atiya (who was not a Mormon) was a professor of Near Eastern Studies at the University of Utah. He knew that the Mormon Church would want the papyrus. The University of Chicago sold the papyrus to the Mormon Church. But when Egyptologists translated the papyrus, they discovered that it was a pagan document called "The Breathing Permit of Horus". The story of Abraham or Joseph could not be found anywhere in the papyrus.

Mormon apologists have tried dozens of different "explanations" to explain how Joseph Smith could have translated "The Book of Abraham" from "The Breathing Permit of Horus"; a book which leads the soul of the deceased to the Underwould where he is judged by the god Osiris. The heart of the deceased is weighed in a balance, and if his heart is heavier than a feather, his soul is given to the crockadile god to be eaten.



DVD about The Book of Abraham vs. Egyptology sold by the Institute for Religious Research.

If Mormons ask about The Book of Abraham origins they are told "See your bishop". The bishop tells them, "Look, don't worry about it! Just pay your tithing, attend your meetings, and you'll be blessed!" If they ask twice, they are warned they may face a Church Court, and they are told, "Worthy Members of the Church don't ask such questions!"

Most faithful Mormons believe they are in the Only True Church, and the "evidence" for this is the "blessings" that God has given them. For example, a Mormon male who marries a young sexy female will think this is God's "reward" for him being an active faithful Latter-day Saint. A Mormon female who procures a successful Mormon male as a husband, believes the same thing. Mormon men who get job promotions and are successful in business, believe these are further "proofs" that God is "blessing" them for being active in the Only True Church.

One wonders how Atheists or men outside of the "One True Church" ever marry attractive women or have success in career or business! ;^)

Mormons who seek answers to Anti-Mormon claims are viewed by Church leaders as "not having the Spirit" because they "must be" leading secret immoral lives, that is why they are "doubters" and "questioners". They are told that "if they were faithful" they wouldn't be asking questions. To all such questions they receive the same answer....



Mormon Bishop: "Look...don't worry about it! Just follow the Brethren, and YOU'LL BE BLESSED!

Mormons are constantly admonished to "Follow the Brethren"; which means to obey them, do what they command you to do, without question. Mormons are taught from birth that the only way they will become Gods and Goddesses, and be with their loved ones for all eternity, is to UN-questionably obey and follow their Church leaders.



22. Joseph Smith the Glasslooker

Joseph Smith claimed that an Angel named Moroni appeared to him in a vision in 1823 and showed him where there were gold plates deposited which contained a history of the Nephites in America.



An artist's conception of the Gold Plates. Taken back to heaven by the Angel Moroni.

The Gold Plates were given back to the Angel Moroni, thereby denying the world evidence of their existence in the first place.



The Angel Moroni giving Joseph Smith the Gold Plates and the Urim and Thummim (1826)

Mormons are taught from birth to "have faith". Have faith that the Gold Plates existed. Have faith that Joseph Smith was a true Prophet of God. Have faith that their leaders are men of God. Have faith that Church leaders are uncompromisingly honest and totally trustworhty living Prophets who will lead them to the Celestial Kingdom. Mormons are told that only unquestioning faith in "The Brethren" will get them "blessings" on earth and Exaltation with the Gods in Heaven.

While there is no evidence the Gold Plates every existed, there is ample evidence that, before Joseph Smith became a "Prophet" he was known as "Joseph Smith the Glasslooker".

In the days of Joseph Smith, many farmers in that part of New England believed that the Spaniards and British pirates (like Blue Beard, Captain Kidd, etc.) had buried treasures in gold and silver throughout the area. Stories such as these ran wild. Naturally, con-man (called "Jugglers") arose claiming to be able to "see" where these hidden treasures were buried, either with maps, with divining rods, or, occassionally, with "seerstones".

A "Seer" was not an uncommon thing in Upstate New York in the days of Joseph Smith. There were many who claimed to find certain stones whereby is a "seer" looked at the stone, in the dark, they would able to "see things such as where lost property could be located, or, in some cases, where buried treasure was. Joseph Smith Jr. was one of those who claimed to have this ability. This is the seerstone he used:



Joseph Smith never denied he was a "glasslooker". Too many people knew he was. Many neighbors and acquaintances of Joseph Smith later testified in affidavits that Joseph would use his "seerstone" to hunt for buried treasure, but no treasure was ever found because a "charm" was on the treasure that if anyone hit the treasure chest with their shovel, it would sink down into the earth again, and this process would repeat itself.

Those that looked for buried treasures via "seerstones" were called "glass-lookers" (i.e. "glass" being the old Yankee English word for crystal or any shining stone). The "con" usually didn't pay well. In return for digging for buried treasure, Joseph Smith made $14 a month, plus room and board. Very little, but it beat unemployment! In those days there was no welfare, no foodstamps, and no "poor house".

In 1827, Joseph Smith was arrested in Bainbridge, New York, for being a "glasslooker" which under the law was a form of "juggling". What we call "con-men" today were then known as "jugglers".

The following is from the Court Docket of one Justice Neeley, who presided over a preliminary hearing after Joseph Smith was arrested:



It is a undisputable FACT that Joseph Smith was arrested for "glass-looking" four years before he founded the Mormon Church. The best evidence shows he never went to trial, but was given a tongue-lashing by the Justice, then the case was dismissed because Josiah Stowell, the defendant in the case, refused to admit that Joseph Smith "juggled" him. Stowell testified that he gave money to Joseph Smith voluntarily, and that it was not Joseph's fault that no treasure was found.

Peter Ingersoll later swore an affidavit (not part of the case) wherein he claimed to see heard the following take place between Joseph Smith and Isaac Hale, Joseph's father-in-law. Joseph was staying at the Hale home while in Harmony Pennsylvania as a boarder (Harmony PA and Bainbridge NY are very cloese to each other). He later eloped with Emma Hale. A few months later Emma wanted her personal things from her father's house, so Joseph hired his childhood friend and neighbor Peter Ingersoll to go with him to get Emma's things and bring them back to Palmyra.

Peter Ingersoll (family neighbor and friend of Joseph Smith) Affidavit, Palmyra, Wayne County. N. Y. Dec. 2, 1833:
"In the month of August, 1827, I was hired by Joseph Smith, Jr. to go to Pennsylvania, to move his wife's household furniture up to Manchester, where his wife then was. When we arrived at Mr. Hale's, in Harmony, Pa. from which place he had taken his wife, a scene presented itself, truly affecting. His father-in-law (Mr. Hale) addressed Joseph, in a flood of tears: "You have stolen my daughter and married her. I had much rather have followed her to her grave. You spend your time in digging for money -- pretend to see in a stone, and thus try to deceive people." Joseph wept, and acknowledged he could not see in a stone now, nor never could; and that his former pretensions in that respect, were all false. He then promised to give up his old habits of digging for money and looking into stones. Joseph told me on his return, that he intended to keep the promise which he had made to his father-in-law; "but," said he, "it will be hard for me, for they will all oppose, as they want me to look in the stone for them to dig money."And in fact it was as he predicted. They urged him, day after day, to resume his old practice of looking in the stone." (first published in Mormonism Unveiled, 1834)
Affidavit of Isaac Hale (Joseph Smith's father-in-law), given at Harmony Township, Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania on 20 March 1834:

"Emma wrote to me inquiring whether she could have her property, consisting of clothing, furniture, cows, &c. I replied that her property was safe, and at her disposal. In short time they returned, bringing with them a Peter Ingersol[l], and subsequently came to the conclusion that they would move out, and resided upon a place near my residence. Smith stated to me, that he had given up what he called "glass-looking," and that he expected to work hard for a living, and was willing to do so." (ibid.)
William Stafford, a neighbor and fellow treasure seeker:
"Joseph, Jr., could see, by placing a stone of singular appearance in his hat, in such a manner as to exclude all light; at which time they pretended he could see all things within and under the earth, — that he could see within the above mentioned caves, large gold bars and silver plates — that he could also discover the spirits in whose charge these treasures were, clothed in ancient dress." (ibid.)
Mormons apologists respond that the man who gathered this affidavits was one Philastus Hurtburt, a man with a horrible reputation as a womanizer. Be that as it may, none of the witnesses ever came forth to say that they were misquoted in Mormonism Unveiled even though the book was popularly read in the areas where they lived.

It is a common technique among Mormon Apologists (and anti-Mormons as well) to "kill the messenger"; to try to discredit anyone who brings forth evidence against their side.

Joseph Smith was asked if he was ever a "money-digger" and this was his reply:
"Yes, but it was not a very profitable job for him, as he only got fourteen dollars a month for it." (Elder's Journal 1:28-29)
He once wrote that the stories of his money-digging arose because he worked to try to find a silver mine on the Stowell farm, could not find it, and told Stowell to give it up. The the affidavits don't support this. They support the notion that Joseph Smith Jr. belonged to a "gang" of money-diggers (one was his father) and that he pretended to see where buried treasure was, but the treasure would always "slip" down into the group when a spade (shovel) hit the chest; causing the "charm" (spell) over the treasure to sink the box out of reach.

Statements from others, at the Bainbridge hearing, and also from neighbors of Smith in and around Palmyra, confirm this. They say that Joseph Smith pretended to know the location of buried treasure, would put his seerstone in his hat, cover his face with the hat (to block out light), and then tell others where to find treasure. Then he and a group of money-diggers would dig for the treasure, but find nothing, and Joseph would reply that the treasure was "charmed" (i.e. a spell had been cast over it) so that everytime the diggers would hit the chest with their shovels the treasure would sink farther down into the earth. Hard for us to believe today, but, to uneducated superstitious farmers living in the early 19th century, this seemed plausible.

If the statements and affidavits of neighbors of the Smiths can be believed, the Smith family was very poor. Joseph Sr. and his sons hired themselves out as day-laborers to other farmers all around western New York State. But, in many parts of the year, there simply was no work. At age 14 Joseph Jr. found a stone while digging a well for the Chase family. He started to claim to "see" things in the stone. Either he, or his father, decided to "use" this to get more work. Joseph Sr., with some of his friends, and Joseph Jr., would travel all over western New York State in certain parts of the year, hiring themselves out of "money-diggers"; with Joseph Jr. as the "seer" in these operations.

We don't know if Joseph Sr. forced the lad to do this, or if it was Joseph Jr.'s idea all along. One thing for sure: they never found any buried treasure.

In 1826, in Bainbridge, New York, the sons of Josiah Stowell had Joseph Jr. arrested for "glass-looking". No trial was held (as some Anti-Mormon falsely claim); only a preliminary hearing to see if there was enough evidence to go to trail. Joseph Jr. was NOT found guilty! The case was dismissed, because Joseph Stowell basically refused to press charges.

One of the witnesses, Addison Austin, testified that when he was alone with Joseph he asked him if he could see buried treasure in the ground with the seerstone. Austin testified that Joseph replied:
"To be candid, between you and me, I cannot, anymore thanyou or any body else; but any way to get a living." ("Mormonites" Evangelical Magazine and Gospel Advocate, April 9, 1831, p.120)
Many years later, perhaps in another candid moment, Joseph Smith Jr. wrote:
"During this time, as is common to most, or all youths, I fell into many vices and follies; but as my accusers are, and have been forward to accuse me of being guilty of gross and outrageous violation of the peace and good order of the community. I take the occasion to remark that, though as I have said above, 'as is common to most, or all youths, I fell into many vices and follies.'" (A Comprehensive History of The Church, vol. 1, p. 70).
If Joseph Smith Jr. could lie about seeing buried treasure in a seestone in order to make money (although he made very little doing this), is he capable for lying about seeing God and Gold Plates to make alot MORE money?

Joseph Smith was once asked what "Mormon" meant. Joseph replied that "Mormon" meant "MORE GOOD". For Joseph Smith Jr, more women, more property, more titles, more praise, more adulation, more blind followers, andMORMONey was "MORE GOOD"!

There is evidence to suggest that in 1825, Oliver Cowder, a scribe and friend of William Morgan, fled New York State. Morgan had been kidnapped, and was presumed dead, killed by Masons angry at his coming expos´e of their secret rites. His scribe, Cowdery, fled to Ohio where some of his relatives lived, painfully close to where Sidney Rigdon was living and preaching, and secretly writing a new book of scripture that would unite Christian America under one "Church of Christ". Somehow they met, and Cowdery told Sidney of his helping Morgan write a book. Rigdon saw in Cowdery a helper. Cowdery then must told Rigdon he had a cousin in Palymra, who saw treasures in the Earth. Rigdon, an avid student of the Bible, must have then thought of the following verse in the Bible:
"Truth shall spring out of the earth; and righteousness shall look down from heaven." (Psalms 85:11)
By 1829 The Book of Mormon was published, with the Campbellism of Rigdon, the anti-Masonic rhetoric of Cowdery, and even a few "jabs" from Joseph Smith at his old money-digging buddies:
"And these Gadianton robbers, who were among the Lamanites, did infest the land, insomuch that the inhabitants thereof began to ahide up their btreasures in the earth; and they became slippery, because the Lord had cursed the land, that they could not hold them, nor retain them again." (Mormon 1:18)
Joseph Smith learned as a very young man that lies could get you things you needed to live, and to live well.

Most of us cannot imagine lying about speaking with God in order to "get gain", but, the world is full of such men, and women! How many TV preachers have said "God told me that you needed to send me YOUR MONEY to show faith in Him!"? There have been hundreds, and many thousands of them if you count the small timers! There have been religious charatans since the world began, from the village Shaman who pretended to speak to spirits, to the phoney Spiritualists of the 19th century who used to ring bells under tables with their toes in the dark, to the modern day with the television "faith healers" who tell people "Jesus has HEALED you!" then the people go home and die of cancer a few weeks or months later.

The world is FULL of religious charlatans, who use the name of God and/or Jesus to PULL THE WOOL over the eyes of others, all for sex, money, and power. And most of them are all too successful! The successful ones have "charisma".

And I'm very sorry to say (and I mean that sincerely), but Joseph Smith Jr. was one of them. He was incredibly successful, because he had what ALL THE OTHER religious charlatans and ALL CON-MEN and succesfful politicians also have: "charisma". People were naturally attracted to Joseph Smith because he was "charismatic". All con-men are. That's why they are successful. That is why Sidney Rigdon chose Joseph Smith to be his "front man"; because Joseph Smith had charisma, and Rigdon did not.

Joseph Smith Jr., the poor farm boy who often could not afford shoes, found that pretending got you things: money, women, power, praise, property, adoration, etc. He counted on that. Like all religious charlatans, he counted on the fact "he" was "smart" and the religious people were "gullible". He counted on that.

But, what Joseph Smith had NOT counted on, was the Law of Karma, which eventually caught up to him at Carthage Jail, Illinois, on June 24th, 1844.






Conclusion

What I have written in these 22 FACTS is pure truth that are all recognized, accepted, and are UNdisputed by Mormon historians! They will admit to you every FACT herein. They will admit:
*Joseph Smith was a polygamist and had up to 33 wives but he publicly denied many times he was a polygamist, and always publicly condemned polygamy.
*Joseph Smith secretly married his own foster-daughters; the Lawrence sisters.
*Joseph Smith secretly married a mother and her own daughter, in violation of Levitical Code.
*Nancy Rigdon and Sarah Pratt both claimed Joseph Smith tried to seduce them (Sarah Pratt being married at the time to Orson Pratt who was on a mission for the Church in England)
*Joseph Smith illegal closed down the Nauvoo Expositor after it honestly and accurately reported that he was a secret polygamist; his closing down the paper and destroying the Expositor property is the reason that is why he was arrested.
*Joseph Smith tried to flee Nauvoo to avoid arrest, but returned after his closest supporters accused him of cowardace.
*Joseph Smith shot two members of the mob; he did not go "as a lamb to the slaughter" as Mormons are taught.
*Joseph Smith tried giving the Masonic "Grand Hailing Sign of Distress" before being shot.
*Joseph Smith translated a portion of the phoney Kinderhook Plates.
*Joseph Smith was arrested in 1826 in Bainbridge, New York, as a "juggler" (i.e. the term then used for "con-man"); for claiming to see buried treasure in his seerstone.
*Joseph Smith's "Book of Abraham" cannot be found in the papyrus (re-discovered in 1967) he said it was translated from.
*Oliver Cowdery was a counterfeiter.
*Brigham Young owned distilleries, a beer hall, and tobacco farms, and rented out houses as brothels in Salt Lake City.
*T.B.H. Stenhouse, a former friend of Brigham Young, later wrote a book claiming Young stole hundreds of thousands of dollars in tithing money from the Tithing Office each and every year.
*Brigham Young died one of the wealthiest men in America; where did he get the money?
*Brigham Young's former bodyguard, Bill Hickman, "claimed" Young had people murdered who got in his way.
*About a dozen people close to Solomon Spaulding, sware in affidits that The Book of Mormon is based upon "Manuscript Found in the Wilds of Mormon" (his second manuscript called "Manuscript Found") by Rev. Spaulding; a book "lost" from the Robert Patterson Printing Office in Pittsburg.
*R.W. Alderman swore in in 1884 affidavit that Martin Harris told him in 1856 that Rigdon wrote The Book of Mormon based upon a manuscript he stole from a printing office in Pittsburg in 1822.
*Solomon and Sidney were both in Pittsburg in 1816, a small village at that time.
*Ancient America never had oxen, nor asses, nor sheep as The Book of Mormon claims the Nephites had (in the millions)
*Not one Nephite artifact has been recovered, and not one Nephite city has been unearthed to date.
*The American Indians are Asians and have no Semitic ancestry whatsoever: not one Semitic "gene" in their DNA.
*There have been many changes in the Mormon Temple Endowment Ceremony, as recently as 1990.
*Many of the rites in the Mormon temple were taken directly from Masonic Rites such as the "Five Points of Fellowship" (removed in 1990).
*Brigham Young legalized slavery in Utah in 1850, and several Mormon apostles owned black slaves.
*Brigham Young and other Church Presidents and Apostles taught from 1848 until 1978 (130 year period) theCurse of Cain Doctrine; that "Negroes" are "cursed" and "inferior" and the children of Cain and were "less valiant" in the War in Heaven.
*The Church ended the priesthood-ban on June 8th, 1978,after it was discovered that 65% of white Brazilian Mormon priesthood-holders had Negro blood in them, and after the U.S. government made threats to end the Church's tax-exempt status if they continued to "discriminate" against blacks.
*Joseph Smith's closest friends and associates in the Church, David Whitmer, Martin Harris, John C. Bennett, Sidney Rigdon, Oliver Cowdery, William Law, all claimed at one time or another that Joseph was an adulterer, a liar, a polygamist, and "fallen prophet".
*Brigham Young taught many doctrines which the Mormon Church today calls "false"; such as the Adam-God Doctrine.
*Mark Hofmann, the forger-bomber, FOOLED Mormon Church leaders, including Gordon B. Hinckley, for five years; selling the Church forged documents which the Church immediately tried to hide from the public.
*Joseph Smith's 1891 prophecies concerning the second coming of Christ failed.

Will Mormons accept these FACTS? No! By no means! As the saying goes, "A man convinced against his will, is of the same opinion still!. The vast great majority of Mormons won't even read this. And the few who do, 90% of them will dismiss this with a wave of the hand as "all lies".
But....they are not lies....they are PURE TRUTH!
All these are indisputable facts, which Mormon historians will acknowledge and the Mormon Church will NOT deny. Mormons who ask questions such as these are told, "Don't worry about it! Just pay your tithing, attend your meetings, and you'll be blessed!" If they keep asking they are threatened with a Church Court. If excommunicated, the Mormon believes he will never become a God, and never see his loved ones again after death.

If you wish to still join the Mormon Church after knowing all this, then do so. It is a great place to raise a family. If you are conservative, non-smoking/non-drinking middle-class white American, you can find much happiness in the Mormon Church. Really...you can. The Church has excellent social programs for youth, young adults, singles, and married couples. Just don't ask too many questions!

But, of course, most Mormons NEVER ask! They simply blindly obey their leaders. They believe their leaders are the closest men to God on earth, and would NEVER lie to them!

Not one in 1000 Mormons will ever read this article! They will ignore it, out of hand. As soon as they see it is "Anti-Mormon" they will dismiss it without reading it, they will ignore it, without a second thought! They will dismiss me as a "liar" and "adulterer". They'll close their eyes, and their ears.




But the TRUTH is....I'm NOT lying. Mormon historians KNOW what I've said is true. They know. Rank-and-file Mormons don't know, and Church leaders want to make sure they'll never know..."for their own good" of course!